Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of the ORLIK 2012 sports field on plot 1775/2 in Zagórów

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00170933/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Wielkopolskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Wielkopolskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of the ORLIK 2012 sports field on plot 1775/2 in Zagórów

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are provided in the description.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contractor must not be subject to exclusion based on legal provisions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The contractor must have the permits to perform specific activities or actions if required by law.
--The contractor must possess the necessary knowledge and experience, as well as technical and human potential to execute the order.
--The contractor must be in an economic and financial situation ensuring the execution of the order.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The contractor will be obliged to prepare the design documentation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are provided in the description.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a5d-c5a4-e9e0-056e-e50001aab5c0.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the renovation of the ORLIK 2012 sports field in Zagórów, Poland, with bids to be submitted electronically.

2025-02-21 0000 Zagórów pfu.pdfPDF
2025-02-21 0000 Zagórów pfu.pdf -- 621.8 KB

No content extracted

2025-02-21 0001 Zagórów PZT.pdfPDF
2025-02-21 0001 Zagórów PZT.pdf -- 157.9 KB

No content extracted

2025-02-21 0002 Zagórów mapa.pdfPDF
2025-02-21 0002 Zagórów mapa.pdf -- 335.8 KB

No content extracted

SWZ.pdfPDF
SWZ.pdf

This document contains the tender specifications for the renovation of the ORLIK 2012 sports field in Zagórów, including details on the contracting authority, tender procedure, and scope of works.

Zał. nr 1 - OŚWIADCZENIE WYKONAWCY .docDOC
Zał. nr 1 - OŚWIADCZENIE WYKONAWCY .doc

This document is a bidder's declaration of meeting participation conditions and not being subject to exclusion for the "ORLIK 2012 sports field renovation" project.

Zał. nr 2- zobowiązanie podmiotu.docDOC
Zał. nr 2- zobowiązanie podmiotu.doc

This document contains a commitment from a subcontractor to provide resources for the renovation of an ORLIK sports field.

Zał. nr 3 - oświadczenie grupa kapitałowa.docDOC
Zał. nr 3 - oświadczenie grupa kapitałowa.doc

This document is a declaration concerning affiliation with a capital group, required for the tender "Remont boiska ORLIK 2012 na działce 1775/2 w Zagórowie".

Zał. nr 4 - wykaz robót budowlanych.docDOC
Zał. nr 4 - wykaz robót budowlanych.doc

This document contains a list of construction works performed by the bidder, including their type, value, date, and place of execution, to be submitted as part of the tender for the renovation of the ORLIK 2012 sports field.

Zał. nr 5 - projekt istotnych postanowień umownych.pdfPDF
Zał. nr 5 - projekt istotnych postanowień umo...

This document contains the draft of essential contract provisions for the public procurement of the "ORLIK 2012 sports field renovation in Zagórów" project, including design and construction works.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the renovation of a sports field is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration and financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a CPV code, a clear procedure (though not specified beyond 'None'), and available documentation. Deadlines are present, but their reasonableness is questionable given the short timeframe. No disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the renovation works is clear, and the mandatory requirements for bidders are outlined. The attached documents provide further detail on project specifics and contract terms. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to fully assess the clarity of the selection process.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a submission deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions. A good number of relevant documents are attached and analyzed.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting fairness. Eligibility and exclusion grounds are clearly stated, and the required documents are accessible. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but the criteria are not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is possible. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks contradicts this. The absence of disclosed financing information and contract duration, along with a potentially short deadline, reduces practicality.

No e-submission (contradictory flag)
Missing financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present, and the status is 'active'. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates are logically presented, with the submission deadline well into the future from the date of the tender notice.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents or description. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Comprehensive set of required documents
E-procurement characteristic indicated
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and financing details
Potential for a short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Provide details on the contract duration and financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline