Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Delivery of furniture for the Pathomorphology Department

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00166918/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie, Poland
Published
August 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€90,670
Avg. Bids
0.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
20,092 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of furniture for the Pathomorphology Department

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for office furniture for the Department of Pathomorphology at Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny w Olsztynie presents a moderate competition opportunity. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and emphasis on core requirements suggests a focus on price and basic compliance. A winning strategy will involve a competitive price, robust technical compliance, and clear demonstration of reliability.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Compliant Furniture Supply for Healthcare Environments

Cost-Effective Solution Meeting All Technical Specifications

Seamless Delivery and Installation for Minimal Disruption

Key Opportunities
Potential for price leadership due to lack of explicit quality weighting.
Focus on meeting all mandatory technical requirements to avoid disqualification.
Leveraging existing supplier relationships or bulk purchasing to offer competitive pricing.
Key Challenges
Unspecified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy beyond compliance and price.

Assume price will be a significant factor and ensure all mandatory requirements are met with absolute certainty. Focus on clear, concise documentation that demonstrates full compliance.

Potential for high competition if the tender is attractive and the estimated value is significant.

Conduct thorough market research to understand potential competitors and their likely pricing strategies. Prepare a highly competitive price point.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced supplier of office furniture with a proven track record of delivering to public sector institutions, particularly healthcare facilities. They should possess a strong understanding of procurement regulations, the ability to offer competitive pricing, and a streamlined delivery and installation process.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in supplying furniture to similar healthcare facilities, highlighting understanding of specific needs (e.g., durability, hygiene).
A clear and concise proposal that meticulously addresses all mandatory requirements, leaving no room for ambiguity.
A highly competitive price point that reflects efficient operations and potential for economies of scale.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a voluntary commitment to using locally sourced materials or employing local labor for installation, if feasible, to subtly enhance the bid's appeal without violating tender terms.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Submit the most competitive price possible while ensuring profitability. This is likely to be a primary driver of the award given the lack of specified evaluation criteria.

Technical Compliance

Thoroughly review and address all technical capability requirements. Ensure all documentation is accurate and complete to avoid disqualification. Highlight product quality and suitability for a pathology department.

Mandatory Requirements

Ensure absolute adherence to all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and submission requirements. Any deviation will lead to disqualification.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Compliance Check
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an exhaustive review of all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements. Ensure every document and statement is accurate and complete.

Prevents disqualification and forms the foundation of a compliant bid.
Price Competitiveness Analysis
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume price will be a major factor. Perform a detailed cost analysis to determine the lowest viable price that ensures profitability. Benchmark against potential market rates.

Maximizes chances of winning if price is a primary award criterion.
Highlight Healthcare Sector Experience
MediumMed effort

If the bidder has prior experience supplying furniture to hospitals or medical facilities, emphasize this. Detail understanding of specific needs like durability, ease of cleaning, and functionality in a laboratory setting.

Adds value beyond basic compliance, potentially influencing subjective evaluation if present.
Streamlined Delivery & Installation Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a clear, efficient plan for delivery and installation, emphasizing minimal disruption to the hospital's operations. Include timelines and proposed logistics.

Demonstrates operational efficiency and consideration for the client's operational needs.
Clarification on Unspecified Criteria
HighLow effort

If possible and within the tender rules, seek clarification from the contracting authority regarding the evaluation criteria or any ambiguities in the technical requirements.

Reduces uncertainty and allows for a more targeted bid strategy.
Voluntary Sustainability Commitment
LowLow effort

Despite 'Green Procurement: No', consider a brief, voluntary statement about sustainable material sourcing or waste reduction during installation, if genuinely practiced. This can be a subtle positive differentiator.

Minor positive impression, no negative impact if not feasible.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective and reliable solution that fully meets all mandatory requirements. Emphasize operational efficiency and a proven ability to deliver on time and without issues, especially given the critical nature of a hospital environment.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88d3-5ce4-46d9-056e-e50001aa9bc7.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the supply of furniture for the Department of Pathomorphology, with the evaluation criteria solely based on price.

17TP SWZ.pdfPDF
17TP SWZ.pdf -- 683.5 KB

No content extracted

17TP ZaêÑcznik nr 1 - Formularz ofertowy.docxDOC
17TP ZaêÑcznik nr 1 - Formularz ofertowy.docx -- 39.3 KB

No summary available for this document.

17TP ZaêÑcznik nr 2 - Formularz cenowy.xlsxXLS
17TP ZaêÑcznik nr 2 - Formularz cenowy.xlsx -- 30.2 KB

No summary available for this document.

17TP ZaêÑcznik nr 3 - Projekt umowy.pdfPDF
17TP ZaêÑcznik nr 3 - Projekt umowy.pdf -- 193.6 KB

No summary available for this document.

17TP zaêÑcznik nr 4 - oÿwiadczenie na podstawie art. 125 ust 1 ustawy Pzp.docxDOC
17TP zaêÑcznik nr 4 - oÿwiadczenie na podstaw... -- 24.0 KB

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for office furniture is active and has key documents available, but lacks disclosed financial value and explicit evaluation criteria beyond price.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to adhere to general procurement regulations with proper CPV codes and an active status. However, the absence of a "reveal date" and explicit evaluation criteria beyond price slightly impacts compliance certainty, though this is not a critical flaw for this stage.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and essential documents like the draft contract and price form are attached. The AI-extracted requirements list mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, indicating a structured approach.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not explicitly stated, which are significant omissions for a complete tender package.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Key documents are provided, and the use of a standard CPV code suggests a fair approach. However, the evaluation criteria are stated to be solely based on price, which, while common, may limit competition if not balanced with other objective factors. No indications of tailored requirements for specific companies were found.

Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as 'E-Procurement', suggesting online submission capabilities. The contract start date is missing, and while financing information is typically part of full contract details, its absence here is noted. The duration is also not specified, impacting practical planning.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical in sequence. The CPV code is specific and appropriate.

Sustainability50/100

There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No sustainability criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
Documents available for download
E-Procurement indicated
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Evaluation criteria not explicitly detailed beyond price

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value to aid bidder assessment.
2. Specify the contract duration for better planning.
3. Clarify evaluation criteria beyond price to ensure a balanced assessment.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline