Tenders

The Supply of Electrodes & Accessories

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
013393-2026
Value
£89,644
Location
Shropshire and Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£89,644
Duration
24 months
Location
Shropshire and Staffordshire
Type
Other
68
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

WBF0118 - The Supply of Electrodes & Accessories

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-03-06T12:00:00+00:00.
--Ensure the bid addresses cost, which will be weighted 90% in the award criteria.
--Ensure the bid addresses social value and quality, which will be weighted 10% in the award criteria.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements identified from the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements identified from the provided summaries.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to supply electrodes and accessories as described in the tender (CPV Category: 31711140).
--Ability to commit to a 24-month contract duration for the supply of electrodes and accessories.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements identified from the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
013393-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides public information about a tender from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust for the supply of electrodes and accessories, including buyer details and publication date.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013393-2026_ocds_release.json

This document is an OCDS Release Package providing structured data about the tender for the supply of Electrodes & Accessories by University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013393-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust for the supply of electrodes and accessories, detailing estimated value, contract dates, submission deadlines, and award criteria.

Tender NoticeHTM
013393-2026.html

This tender notice from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust invites bids for the supply of electrodes and accessories, valued at an estimated £74,703.57, with a submission deadline of March 6, 2026, and award criteria weighted 90% on cost and 10% on social value/quality.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electrodes and accessories is generally well-structured for a below-threshold open competition, featuring clear basic information and defined award criteria, but its practicality and fairness are significantly hampered by the absence of electronic submission.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes clearly, and the 21-day submission period is reasonable for a below-threshold tender. However, the AI summary lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are crucial for full compliance visibility.

AI summary lacks detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements.
Clarity70/100

The tender description and award criteria (90% cost, 10% social value/quality) are clearly stated. However, the AI summary indicates a lack of specific eligibility, financial, and detailed technical requirements, which reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

AI summary lacks specific eligibility and financial requirements.
Detailed performance conditions are not explicitly summarized.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV code are all present. However, the AI summary's indication of missing detailed eligibility, financial, and exclusion criteria suggests that the readily available information is not fully comprehensive.

AI summary lacks detailed eligibility, financial, and exclusion criteria.
Fairness65/100

The tender's value is disclosed, and award criteria are objective and transparent. Requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant barrier to equal access and fairness in modern procurement practices.

Lack of electronic submission capability.
Practicality50/100

The contract duration and start date are clearly specified. However, the critical absence of electronic submission functionality is a major practical drawback, increasing administrative burden for bidders.

Lack of electronic submission capability.
Data Consistency85/100

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. While some minor fields like 'Liable Person' are empty, the core data is consistent. The internal contradictions in the provided 'Issues/Flags' vs. 'AI-extracted requirements' have been resolved by prioritizing the more detailed AI content.

Minor fields (e.g., Liable Person) are unpopulated.
Sustainability60/100

The tender explicitly includes 'social value' as 10% of the award criteria, which is a positive aspect. However, there is no explicit focus on green procurement or innovation, limiting its overall sustainability profile.

No explicit focus on green procurement.
No explicit focus on innovation.

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value, duration).
Explicitly defined award criteria (90% cost, 10% social value/quality).
Reasonable submission deadline for a below-threshold procedure.
Inclusion of social value in award criteria.
Availability of tender documents and OCDS data.

Concerns

Absence of electronic submission capability.
AI summary lacks detailed eligibility, financial, and exclusion criteria.
No explicit focus on green procurement or innovation.
Minor unpopulated fields in basic information.

Recommendations

1. Implement electronic submission to enhance fairness and practicality.
2. Ensure all detailed eligibility, financial, and exclusion criteria are clearly stated and easily accessible.
3. Consider integrating green procurement and innovation aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline