Skip to main content
Tenders

Queue management system license rental

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168395
Value
€18,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Financial proposalPrice
Technical proposalTechnical
Experience in providing similar servicesExperience
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€18,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€171,259
Avg. Bids
1.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
736 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Queue management system license rental

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-03-31T10:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in the specified format.
--All required documentation must be included with the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not be subject to any of the grounds for exclusion specified in the Public Procurement Law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be registered in the relevant commercial register.
--Bidders must have the necessary licenses and permits to operate.
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must have experience in providing similar services.
--Bidders must provide a detailed technical proposal outlining their solution.
--Bidders must meet specific performance standards for the queue management system.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a financial proposal.
--The financial proposal should be competitive and reflect the market value.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168395_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260316175537.pdf -- 102.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the rental of queue management system licenses, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical specifications, and financial proposal requirements.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_55.docx -- 92.8 KB

This document contains the regulations for a tender process organized by Riga's Paula Stradins Clinical University Hospital for the rental of queue management system licenses.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains basic data for a procurement tender for the rental of a line management system license by Paula Stradiņa Clinical University Hospital, with a deadline for submissions on March 31, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for queue management system licenses is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general public procurement law, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The mention of mandatory exclusion grounds aligns with regulatory requirements.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected from bidders. The attached documents are described as outlining requirements and regulations, contributing to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the 'Issues' section flags restricted document access, which impacts the completeness of information available to potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The AI-extracted requirements are objective. However, the 'Issues' section explicitly mentions 'Restricted document access', which is a significant concern for fairness and full document access for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and raises questions about the practical submission process. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.

No e-submission indicated despite e-procurement characteristic
Contract start date not explicitly specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically ordered. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, contributing to good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of specific sustainability considerations.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Reasonable submission deadline
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Open procedure and e-procurement characteristic

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to align with the e-procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline