Legal Compliance100/100
The tender refers to standard public procurement regulations and the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds, which aligns with legal requirements for the initial stage of a DPS.
Clarity40/100
The purpose of the DPS and its operational model (mini-competitions) is clearly stated. However, the specific requirements for admission to the DPS, particularly regarding technical capability and financial standing, are not detailed, leading to significant ambiguity for potential bidders.
•Specific technical capability criteria are not detailed.
•Specific financial standing criteria are not detailed.
Completeness75/100
The notice provides basic information about the DPS structure. However, it is incomplete regarding the specific criteria that will be used to assess technical capability and financial standing for admission to the DPS, and no supporting documents are provided.
•Missing specific technical and financial criteria for DPS admission.
•No tender documents attached or referenced for further detail.
Fairness60/100
The DPS structure itself promotes fairness by allowing continuous entry. Nevertheless, the absence of detailed technical and financial criteria in the notice could hinder fair competition by making it difficult for potential bidders to understand the exact bar for entry, potentially leading to inconsistent application or perceived subjectivity.
•Lack of detailed technical and financial criteria could lead to perceived subjectivity or inconsistent application, potentially hindering fair competition.
Practicality40/100
The DPS model is practical for recurring works, offering flexibility and broader market access over time. However, the lack of upfront detail on specific requirements might increase the administrative burden for bidders trying to ascertain suitability and for the contracting authority in managing inquiries.
•Potential for increased bidder inquiries due to lack of specific criteria.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information within the notice is internally consistent.
Sustainability0/100
No specific sustainability (green procurement) or social criteria are mentioned in the extracted requirements or the description, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate these important aspects.
•Absence of green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social criteria.