Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Current supplies of shoemaking materials for the Tadeusz Maliński District Hospital in Śrem Ltd.

Closed

Updated November 06, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00134637/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Wielkopolskie, Poland
Published
October 30, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
33141110-4 — Dressings
Lots
Divided into lots
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Wielkopolskie
Type
Supplies
70
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€57,338
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
78%
293,505 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Current supplies of shoemaking materials for the Tadeusz Maliński District Hospital in Śrem Ltd.

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender presents a moderate opportunity for suppliers of surgical materials. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements necessitates a proactive approach to demonstrating value and reliability. A winning strategy will focus on competitive pricing, robust supply chain management, and a clear understanding of the hospital's needs, even in the absence of explicit detail.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and consistent supply of essential surgical materials to ensure uninterrupted patient care.

Competitive and transparent pricing that offers excellent value for the hospital's budget.

A responsive and efficient partner committed to meeting the specific needs of the Tadeusz Maliński County Hospital.

Key Opportunities
The absence of specified evaluation criteria creates an opportunity to define the value proposition through the bid itself.
The short contract duration (12 months) may appeal to bidders looking for a focused engagement, potentially leading to less intense competition.
The tender is for 'ongoing supply,' indicating a need for a stable, long-term partner, which can be leveraged by bidders with strong supply chain capabilities.
Key Challenges
Lack of detailed technical, financial, and eligibility requirements makes it difficult to tailor the bid precisely.

Conduct thorough market research on typical requirements for such tenders in Poland and assume standard best practices. Focus on demonstrating robust capabilities in all areas, even if not explicitly requested. Proactively offer detailed product specifications and quality assurances.

The absence of specified evaluation criteria means the weighting and importance of different aspects of the bid are unknown.

Assume that price will be a significant factor, but also emphasize reliability, quality, and delivery. Structure the bid to highlight strengths across all potential evaluation areas, such as product quality, delivery timeliness, and customer service.

Potential for a large number of bidders due to the broad CPV code and lack of specific pre-qualification, leading to price pressure.

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy while ensuring profitability. Focus on operational efficiencies that allow for cost savings. Highlight any unique selling propositions beyond price, such as superior product quality or specialized support.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established supplier of surgical materials with a proven track record of reliable delivery to healthcare institutions, particularly in Poland. The ideal bidder possesses a strong understanding of the Polish procurement landscape, efficient logistics, and the ability to offer competitive pricing. Experience with similar hospital tenders, even if not explicitly detailed in this notice, would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds.
Submission of a complete and accurate bid in the required format by the deadline.
Demonstration of the ability to supply surgical materials (CPV: 33141110-4).
Understanding and meeting the hospital's ongoing supply needs for surgical materials.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated understanding of the specific needs of a county hospital in Poland, including potential for tailored product offerings or delivery schedules.
Exceptional customer service and responsiveness, with a dedicated point of contact for the hospital.
Evidence of a resilient and efficient supply chain capable of ensuring uninterrupted delivery of critical surgical materials.
Competitive pricing achieved through optimized logistics and operational efficiency.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to prioritizing local sourcing of materials where feasible, contributing to the regional economy.
Offer training or educational resources to hospital staff on the optimal use of supplied materials, enhancing clinical practice.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceN/A (assumed high)

Develop a cost-effective pricing model based on efficient operations and supply chain management. Offer tiered pricing or volume discounts if applicable. Ensure transparency in pricing.

Product Quality and SpecificationsN/A (assumed high)

Provide detailed product specifications, certifications, and quality assurance documentation for all offered surgical materials. Highlight compliance with relevant EU and Polish standards.

Delivery and LogisticsN/A (assumed high)

Outline a clear and reliable delivery plan, including lead times, order processing, and contingency measures for disruptions. Emphasize timely and accurate fulfillment of orders.

Supplier Reliability and ExperienceN/A (assumed medium)

Provide evidence of past performance, client testimonials, and financial stability. Showcase experience in supplying to healthcare facilities.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly review all tender documents for hidden requirements.
CriticalMed effort

Despite AI extraction, meticulously examine all provided documents (Notice PDF, ZP_8_26.odt, SWZ_8_26.pdf, etc.) for any implicit or explicit requirements not immediately apparent. Pay close attention to the SWZ document as it is the primary specification.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Assume price is a primary evaluation factor and price competitively.
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified criteria, it is highly probable that price will be a dominant factor. Develop a lean cost structure and offer a compelling price point that balances competitiveness with profitability.

Significantly increases the chance of winning if price is a key differentiator.
Emphasize supply chain reliability and product quality.
HighMed effort

Highlight robust inventory management, efficient logistics, and stringent quality control processes. Provide certifications and evidence of consistent product quality to build trust and demonstrate capability beyond just price.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to meet ongoing needs and differentiates from price-only focused competitors.
Proactively define and articulate value beyond price.
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are missing, explicitly state the value proposition in the bid. This could include superior customer service, flexible delivery options, technical support, or product innovation (even if not explicitly requested).

Helps the hospital understand the full benefit of choosing the bidder.
Prepare for potential unstated requirements by over-delivering on standard expectations.
HighMed effort

In the absence of detailed requirements, ensure the bid covers all standard aspects of supplying surgical materials, such as detailed product lists, delivery schedules, quality assurances, and contact information, with a high degree of professionalism and completeness.

Minimizes the risk of being disqualified due to perceived omissions.
Incorporate a commitment to local economic contribution.
MediumLow effort

Include a statement about prioritizing local suppliers for any ancillary services or materials, or a commitment to employing local staff where possible, to align with broader public sector objectives.

Enhances the bid's appeal by demonstrating corporate social responsibility.
Structure the bid for clarity and ease of evaluation.
MediumMed effort

Organize the bid document logically, using clear headings and concise language. Make it easy for the contracting authority to find the information they need, even without explicit evaluation criteria.

Improves the bidder's perceived professionalism and makes the evaluation process smoother.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most reliable and cost-effective supplier of surgical materials, emphasizing a strong understanding of the hospital's operational needs and a commitment to uninterrupted supply. Highlight operational efficiencies that translate into competitive pricing and superior service levels.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de784d-4d57-f26f-056e-e50001ac0ac3.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the supply of surgical materials to the Tadeusz Maliński County Hospital in Śrem, Poland, with offers to be submitted electronically.

08de75fe-0496-f091-c48f-610001eb72e9.pdfPDF
08de75fe-0496-f091-c48f-610001eb72e9.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the supply of surgical materials to the Tadeusz Maliński County Hospital in Śrem, Poland, with offers to be submitted electronically.

SWZ_8_26.pdfPDF
SWZ_8_26.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Order Conditions (SWZ) for a public procurement procedure concerning the ongoing supply of surgical materials to a hospital in Śrem, Poland.

ZAŁ_1_1.odsDOC
ZAŁ_1_1.ods

No content extracted

Zał od 2 do 6 - ZP_8_26.odtDOC
Zał od 2 do 6 - ZP_8_26.odt

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for surgical materials exhibits good general compliance and clarity, but lacks specific detail in critical areas, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and sustainability. The undisclosed value and limited document specifics present minor concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement principles with a clear procedure indicated by the reference number and active status. Proper CPV code is provided. No immediate disputes or regulatory non-compliance are apparent from the available data. The submission deadline, while perhaps short, is present. The 'Procedure: None' is unusual and might indicate a simplified procedure or an oversight, but doesn't automatically imply non-compliance without further context.

Clarity70/100

The title and description clearly state the subject of the procurement: ongoing supply of surgical materials for the specified hospital. The CPV code is correctly identified. However, a significant lack of clarity exists regarding evaluation criteria and eligibility, technical, and financial requirements. These crucial aspects are completely missing, making it difficult for potential bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

•Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Basic information such as title, organization, CPV, and deadline is present. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial requirement details (exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial) are absent. While multiple documents are listed, their content summaries are minimal or missing for some ('unknown' type), hindering a full understanding of the tender's scope and requirements.

•Estimated value not disclosed
•Missing crucial requirement details (eligibility, technical, financial)
Fairness85/100

The tender is advertised as e-procurement, promoting accessibility. It is divided into parts, which can increase competition. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness. Critically, the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria creates a potential for subjective assessment. However, without explicit tailoring to specific companies, the fairness score remains relatively high, assuming the missing requirements are detailed in the available documents not fully analyzed here.

•Missing objective evaluation criteria
Practicality60/100

The tender states 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission, which is a positive practical aspect. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, nor is financing information. The duration is provided. However, the lack of disclosed value and the missing details on technical/financial requirements make practical assessment of bid feasibility difficult for potential suppliers.

•Contract start date not specified
•Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, deadline, and CPV are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender publication. The 'Procedure: None' might be an anomaly but doesn't create an immediate data inconsistency.

Sustainability20/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded. This complete absence of sustainability considerations significantly lowers the score in this category.

•No green procurement considerations
•No social aspects mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description of goods
CPV code correctly provided
E-procurement methodology indicated
Divided into parts
Active status and reference number present

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Critical requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) not detailed
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify objective evaluation criteria to ensure fair competition.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Include details on sustainability aspects where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes