Skip to main content
Tenders

Annual inspections of engineering facilities in Rzeszów

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00165301/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€496,142
Avg. Bids
0.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
25,840 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Annual inspections of engineering facilities in Rzeszów

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8682-8f78-a1cb-056e-e50001aa8f7a.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice from the City of Rzeszów for annual inspections of engineering structures within the city.

~$łącznik nr 2-Wytyczne OPZ.docxDOC
~$łącznik nr 2-Wytyczne OPZ.docx -- 162 B

No content extracted

Proj post umowy roczne.docxDOC
Proj post umowy roczne.docx -- 48.0 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik nr 2-Wytyczne OPZ.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 2-Wytyczne OPZ.docx -- 40.7 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik nr 2-Wytyczne OPZ.pdfPDF
Załącznik nr 2-Wytyczne OPZ.pdf -- 539.4 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 1 do umowy - RODO-klauzula.docxDOC
Zał. nr 1 do umowy - RODO-klauzula.docx -- 17.7 KB

No content extracted

Formularz OFERTA tryb podstawowy.docDOC
Formularz OFERTA tryb podstawowy.doc

This document is a tender offer form for annual inspections of engineering facilities in Rzeszów, requiring bidders to provide company details, pricing, and confirm adherence to tender specifications.

SWZ USŁUGI tryb podstawowy.docDOC
SWZ USŁUGI tryb podstawowy.doc

This document contains the Specification of the Order Conditions (SWZ) for annual inspections of engineering structures in Rzeszów, Poland, for services valued below EU thresholds.

Zobowiązanie podmiotu udostępniającego zasoby TP.docDOC
Zobowiązanie podmiotu udostępniającego zasoby...

This document is a commitment and declaration from a resource provider regarding their availability and lack of exclusion grounds for the annual engineering structure inspections in Rzeszów.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for annual engineering structure inspections in Rzeszów is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. The submission deadline is provided, although its reasonableness for the scope is questionable. No disputes are indicated. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the purpose of the tender. Key documents like the tender notice and offer form are available. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. Several required documents are listed, including form templates. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are not detailed within the provided AI-extracted requirements, suggesting they might be solely within the attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
AI-extracted requirements are empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The CPV code is specific. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could potentially hinder a fully objective assessment by bidders. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics' stating 'E-Procurement'. This ambiguity needs clarification. Financing information is not provided.

Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. No disputes or suspensions are noted. Dates are logically presented. The contract duration is specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit sustainability criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code provided
Multiple required documents available
E-procurement indicated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline