Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Development of promotional video materials “RTU Business Card” and “RTU Brand Story” in Latvian and English for the recognition and image building of Riga Technical University

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 26, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
163107
Value
€30,000
Location
Latvia
Published
January 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 08, 2026

Deadline for Questions

January 19, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 26, 2026

Tender Opening

January 26, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€30,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
92111200 — Advertising, propaganda and information film and video-tape production
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€30,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
68
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€14,392
Avg. Bids
1.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
948 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of promotional video materials “RTU Business Card” and “RTU Brand Story” in Latvian and English for the recognition and image building of Riga Technical University
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Offers must be submitted electronically.
--A technical proposal must be submitted.
--A financial proposal must be submitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must not meet any of the specified exclusion criteria outlined in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must meet the general qualification standards as defined in the tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The bidder must have experience with at least three similar video projects within the last three years.
--Key personnel (Producer, Scriptwriter, Director, Operator, and 3D Animator) must meet specific experience requirements as detailed in the tender documents.
--The bidder must be capable of developing promotional video materials titled “RTU Business Card” and “RTU Brand Story” in both Latvian and English languages.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--A financial proposal must be submitted as part of the bid.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaDOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija -- 98.9 KB

This document outlines the comprehensive procurement requirements for the development of promotional video materials titled “RTU Business Card” and “RTU Brand Story” in Latvian and English for Riga Technical University. It details mandatory selection criteria, including the bidder's experience with at least three similar video projects in the last three years, and specific experience requirements for key personnel such as the Producer, Scriptwriter, Director, Operator, and 3D Animator. The document also specifies the mandatory submission of a technical proposal and a financial proposal, outlining the evaluation criteria which prioritize economic advantageousness with a 60% weighting on technical aspects and 40% on the financial offer.

Komisijas atbildeDOC
Komisijas atbilde -- 117.9 KB

This document provides clarifications from Rīgas Tehniskā universitāte regarding tender RTU-2025/116 for the development of promotional video materials. It specifically addresses a tenderer's question about the required use of 3D computer graphics and animation for the "RTU brand story" video. The authority clarifies that the "RTU brand story" should be a dynamic video featuring graphic elements like the RTU logo, values, and text, aligning with the university's identity and current videographic trends. Tenderers have flexibility to propose 3D environment depictions, objects, or characters based on their creative concept.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Nolikums ar pielikumiem -- 102.5 KB

This document outlines the regulations for an open competition by Riga Technical University for the development of promotional video materials ("RTU Business Card" and "RTU Brand Story") in Latvian and English. It details the tender process, including electronic submission requirements, exclusion criteria, qualification standards, and the evaluation of offers based on economic advantageousness, technical proposal, and portfolio. The estimated contract value is 30,000 EUR (excl. VAT), with a completion deadline of April 30, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a clear service need for promotional videos but suffers from critical deficiencies, primarily the complete absence of accessible tender documents and evaluation criteria, severely hindering transparency and fair competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Legal compliance is significantly compromised by the complete lack of accessible tender documents and the absence of evaluation criteria. This makes it impossible for bidders to fully understand their obligations and for the contracting authority to demonstrate adherence to procurement principles. The incorrect CPV code (4) is also a fundamental classification error.

•No accessible tender documents
•Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity40/100

While the overall service description and some technical requirements are clear, the lack of accessible tender documents means crucial details regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, key personnel experience, and specific deadlines (referenced by points like 1.10, 1.12) are entirely missing. This creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

•Vague details on exclusion/eligibility criteria due to missing documents
•Specific technical specification points referenced but not provided
Completeness83/100

The provided information is severely incomplete. The most critical omissions are the full tender documents, which would contain essential details for all requirement categories, and the evaluation criteria. The NUTS code is also missing.

•No accessible tender documents
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness60/100

The absence of accessible tender documents and evaluation criteria fundamentally undermines the fairness of the procurement process. Bidders cannot prepare comprehensive and compliant offers without full information, potentially disadvantaging those without prior insider knowledge. This raises concerns about equal treatment and transparency.

•Lack of equal information for all bidders due to missing documents
•Absence of transparent evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100

It is highly impractical for potential bidders to prepare a compliant and competitive offer without access to the full tender documents, including detailed technical specifications, legal terms, and evaluation criteria. The 2-month contract duration for two complex videos with 3D animation is tight but potentially manageable if the project starts immediately and is well-managed.

•Bidders cannot practically respond without full tender documents
Data Consistency100/100

There is a minor inconsistency regarding e-submission. The extracted requirements state 'Offers must be submitted electronically,' which contradicts the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag. Assuming the extracted requirement is correct, this is a positive aspect. Otherwise, the data is consistent within the limited scope provided.

•Contradiction between extracted requirement (e-submission) and automated check (no e-submission)
Sustainability25/100

No specific green procurement or social criteria have been included in the extracted requirements or flagged by the automated check.

•Absence of green procurement criteria
•Absence of social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and purpose
Open procedure encourages competition
Specific technical requirements (e.g., 3D animation, portfolio submission) ensure quality
Estimated value is disclosed

Concerns

Complete lack of accessible tender documents
Missing evaluation criteria, hindering transparency and fairness
Incorrect and unspecific CPV code (4)
Vague or incomplete details on mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and key personnel experience due to missing documents
Missing NUTS code for geographical scope

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all tender documents, including full technical specifications, legal terms, and detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Correct the CPV code to a specific and relevant classification for video production services.
3. Consider incorporating green procurement and social responsibility criteria to enhance sustainability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes