Aircraft Crew Resource Management (CRM) for up to 4 years

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and an objective evaluation criterion, but faces concerns regarding document accessibility and the absence of sustainability considerations.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the submission timeline is reasonable. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full transparency and compliance with disclosure requirements.

The service description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across various annexes. Evaluation criteria ('lowest price') are explicitly stated, contradicting the automated check's flag. Performance conditions are clearly linked to the technical specification and draft contract.

All basic information, financial details, and timelines are provided. A comprehensive set of 9 documents, including all required forms, is listed. However, the 'Restricted document access' could impede actual completeness for bidders if documents are not easily obtainable.

The tender specifies an objective 'lowest price' evaluation criterion and indicates E-Procurement, promoting equal access. Requirements appear generic for the specialized service. The primary concern for fairness is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which could create an uneven playing field.

E-procurement is indicated, which enhances practicality. However, the absence of a direct document URL and a specific contract start date are minor practical drawbacks for potential bidders.

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical. While automated checks flagged inconsistencies (e.g., e-submission, evaluation criteria), the explicit tender characteristics and AI-extracted requirements appear consistent and reliable.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded.