Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Comprehensive supply of natural gas to the Aquapark in Płock - MOSiR 3/2026

Closed

Updated October 16, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 19, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00150009/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Mazowiecki regionalny, Poland
Published
October 10, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 12, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 19, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
09123000-7 — Natural gas
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Mazowiecki regionalny
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€1,487,473
Avg. Bids
0.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
16,277 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Comprehensive supply of natural gas to the Aquapark in Płock - MOSiR 3/2026

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for natural gas supply to Aquapark Płock presents a straightforward procurement with a clear deliverable. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements creates an opportunity for a bidder to proactively define value and differentiate through competitive pricing and robust supply chain assurance. Focus on meticulous bid preparation and clear communication of reliability will be key.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and uninterrupted natural gas supply for Aquapark Płock.

Competitive and transparent pricing strategy.

Proven expertise in public sector energy procurement.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for proactive value proposition.
Opportunity to define competitive pricing with precision due to unit price flexibility.
Potential to gain advantage by clearly articulating supply chain robustness and reliability.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements creates uncertainty.

Proactively gather information through clarification requests (if permitted) or assume standard public procurement requirements for similar contracts. Prepare robust documentation that demonstrates strong capabilities across all potential areas.

Unspecified evaluation criteria make it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Assume price will be a significant factor given the nature of commodity supply. Focus on delivering a highly competitive price while ensuring all mandatory requirements are met flawlessly. Highlight any implicit value adds like exceptional customer service or reporting.

Potential for late clarification requests or ambiguities due to limited tender document detail.

Submit the bid well in advance of the deadline to allow for any last-minute issues or the need for further clarification. Ensure all bid team members are aligned and have access to all available information.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established natural gas supplier with a proven track record in municipal or public sector contracts, demonstrating financial stability, a reliable supply chain, and efficient logistical capabilities within the PL923 region. The ideal bidder will also be adept at navigating public procurement processes and understanding the importance of competitive pricing in a potentially price-sensitive market.
Key Requirements
Comprehensive natural gas supply for 12 months
Adherence to submission deadline (2026-03-19 08:00:00)
Accurate and compliant offer form (Zał nr 1-7 do SWZ edyt.docx)
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds (details TBD)
Meeting unspecified eligibility, technical, and financial requirements (details TBD)
Key Discriminators
Exceptional price competitiveness.
Demonstrated long-term supply reliability and contingency planning.
Proactive and transparent communication throughout the tender process and contract execution.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on commitment to local employment or sustainable operational practices within the supply chain, framed as a benefit to the local community served by the Aquapark.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceLikely High (N/A)

Develop a highly competitive unit price, leveraging economies of scale and efficient supply chain management. Ensure the final gross price is rounded correctly as per instructions. Consider offering a slight discount for prompt payment if feasible.

ComplianceCritical (N/A)

Meticulously review and complete all sections of the 'FORMULARZ OFERTY' (Zał nr 1-7 do SWZ edyt.docx). Ensure all declarations are accurate and all required fields are populated. Double-check calculations for the total offer price.

ReliabilityImplicitly High (N/A)

In the absence of explicit technical requirements, emphasize the company's track record in reliable energy supply, robust logistics, and contingency plans for potential disruptions. This can be included in an executive summary or a brief company profile if allowed.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Complete Offer Form
CriticalMed effort

Ensure every field in 'FORMULARZ OFERTY' (Zał nr 1-7 do SWZ edyt.docx) is accurately completed, paying close attention to unit price precision (up to five decimal places) and the final gross price rounding (two decimal places).

Ensures bid compliance and avoids immediate disqualification.
Develop a Highly Competitive Price
HighHigh effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume price will be a primary determinant. Conduct thorough cost analysis to offer the most competitive price while maintaining profitability. Leverage any efficiencies in your supply chain.

Significantly increases the likelihood of winning a price-sensitive tender.
Proactively Address Unspecified Requirements
HighMed effort

Since eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are not detailed, prepare comprehensive documentation that demonstrates strong capabilities in these areas. This can include standard company profiles, financial statements, and evidence of past performance in similar contracts.

Mitigates risk of disqualification due to perceived lack of capability.
Highlight Supply Chain Reliability and Contingency
MediumLow effort

In the absence of explicit technical requirements, emphasize your company's robust supply chain, logistical expertise, and contingency plans for ensuring uninterrupted gas delivery to the Aquapark. This can be a subtle differentiator.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver consistently.
Submit Bid Early
MediumLow effort

Submit the bid well before the 2026-03-19 08:00:00 deadline to allow for final checks and to avoid any last-minute technical issues or the need for urgent clarifications.

Reduces risk of submission failure due to technical glitches or time constraints.
Consider a Subtle Social Value Statement
LowLow effort

Although not required, a brief mention of commitment to local community benefits or sustainable practices can add a positive, albeit minor, impression without significant effort.

May subtly enhance the bidder's image.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most reliable and cost-effective supplier, emphasizing a proven track record in public sector contracts and a streamlined, efficient supply chain. Highlight the ability to meet all (even unspecified) requirements with confidence and precision.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information on specific exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de7f60-bfa6-c2dd-056e-e50001ac6d47.pdf

This document is a public tender notice for the comprehensive supply of natural gas to the Aquapark in Płock, Poland.

SWZ MOSiR 3.2026.pdfPDF
SWZ MOSiR 3.2026.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the comprehensive supply of natural gas to the Aquapark in Płock, detailing the tender procedure, eligibility criteria, and contract terms.

Zał nr 1-7 do SWZ edyt.docxDOC
Zał nr 1-7 do SWZ edyt.docx

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for natural gas supply to Aquapark in Płock is generally well-structured, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial requirements, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and specified organization. However, the absence of explicit mention of dispute resolution mechanisms or regulatory compliance details within the provided information slightly lowers the score.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the CPV code is provided. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility/technical/financial requirements within the AI-extracted section reduces overall clarity.

•Missing evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the contract duration and submission deadline is present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the AI-extracted sections, impacting the completeness of the tender documentation.

•Estimated Value not disclosed.
•No information on specific exclusion grounds.
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments. However, no requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

•Value not disclosed.
•Missing evaluation criteria specified.
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract duration. However, the AI-extracted information indicates a lack of e-submission details and financing information, and the deadline might be considered short given the complexity of preparing a bid.

•No e-submission (indicated by AI-extracted issues).
•Financing information not specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The 'active' status is consistent with the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

•Not green procurement.
•No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title and reference number.
Organization and CPV code specified.
Documents are available and analyzed.
E-Procurement characteristic noted.

Concerns

Lack of disclosed estimated value.
Missing specific evaluation criteria.
Absence of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
Potential for a short submission deadline.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria and all specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
3. Ensure the submission deadline is adequate for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes