Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login5 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This OCDS record details the award of a contract by UK Research and Innovation for the supply and delivery of a high-precision vacuum system with motorized stages for optical mirror movement in a vacuum chamber, indicating a concluded procurement.
This OCDS data package provides details on a concluded contract by UK Research and Innovation for a high-precision vacuum system with motorized stages for optical mirror movement, serving as an informational notice rather than a call for new bids.
This document is a contract details notice from UK Research and Innovation, announcing the concluded procurement for a high precision vacuum with motorized stages, awarded to SmarAct GmbH.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This is a contract award notice for a high-precision vacuum system, transparently disclosing the awardee and contract details, but lacking comprehensive information regarding the original competition's requirements and evaluation criteria.
The notice clearly defines the procedure type (Restricted, Below threshold - limited competition) and CPV codes, and confirms no disputes. It fulfills its purpose as a public disclosure of a completed contract award in line with transparency requirements.
The description of the procured item is clear and unambiguous. The notice explicitly states it is an award notice, not a call for competition. However, the absence of any summary or reference to the original evaluation criteria or performance conditions for the competition itself reduces the overall clarity of the procurement process for external observers.
The award notice provides essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, contract start date, and awardee. All listed documents are accessible. Nevertheless, the lack of the original tender requirements and evaluation criteria means the full procurement record is incomplete for a comprehensive understanding of the competition.
The 'limited competition' procedure, combined with the absence of the original evaluation criteria in this notice, makes it impossible to objectively assess the fairness of the competition that led to the award. The flagged 'No e-submission' also indicates a potential barrier to equal access for the original process.
Information regarding the awarded contract, such as start date and duration, is clearly provided. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a practical limitation for potential bidders during the original competition phase.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent with a completed status. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure,' as well as the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' when the value is explicitly disclosed.
The tender information, as presented in this award notice, does not include any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required