Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Acquisition of boards for the needs of Liepāja preschool educational institution “Kriksītis”

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
162817
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
January 09, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 09, 2026

Tender Opening

February 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
39292000 — School slates or boards with writing or drawing surfaces or instruments
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Supplies
63
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€31,439
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
4,396 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Acquisition of boards for the needs of Liepāja preschool educational institution “Kriksītis”

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (12)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (6)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS12
--Complete and submit the official Application Form (Appendix 1).
--Provide company and representative details within the Application Form.
--Declare company status within the Application Form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Requirement to declare company status, implying that certain statuses may lead to exclusion.
--Affirmation of compliance with legal requirements, implying non-compliance may lead to exclusion.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Provide complete company details.
--Provide complete representative details.
--Declare company status.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to supply blackboards/whiteboards as required for Liepāja preschool educational institution “Kriksītis”.
--Provide a technical-financial offer detailing the proposed solution.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Specify the proposed contract price in EUR, excluding VAT.
--Offer the lowest price, as it is the sole selection criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaDOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija

This document outlines the comprehensive requirements for the tender 'Acquisition of blackboards/whiteboards for Liepāja preschool educational institution Kriksītis'. It details mandatory submission documents, including the application form, a declaration of independent offer preparation, and a technical-financial offer form. Bidders must also specify their proposed contract price in EUR without VAT, as the sole selection criterion is the lowest price.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Nolikums ar pielikumiem

This document is Appendix 1 to the Open Competition LVP 2025/225 regulations, serving as the official Application Form for participation in the tender "Acquisition of blackboards for Liepāja preschool educational institution “Kriksītis” needs". Bidders must complete this form, providing company and representative details, declaring their company status, and listing any subcontractors with supporting documentation. It also requires an affirmation of compliance with legal requirements, resource availability, and agreement to all tender terms.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is critically flawed by the complete absence of accessible documentation, rendering it impossible for potential bidders to prepare informed and compliant offers. The lack of transparency and detailed specifications severely undermines the procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender outlines standard mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds, which generally align with procurement regulations. However, the absence of actual tender documents makes it impossible to verify the full legal framework applied or specific clauses, raising concerns about full compliance.

•Absence of accessible tender documents prevents full verification of legal compliance.
Clarity40/100

While extracted requirements provide a basic understanding, the complete absence of official tender documents (e.g., detailed specifications, contract draft, instructions) severely compromises clarity. Key details regarding the required blackboards/whiteboards are missing, making it difficult for bidders to understand the exact scope.

•Lack of detailed technical specifications for the blackboards/whiteboards.
•Absence of official tender documents (e.g., full terms, contract draft, detailed instructions).
Completeness75/100

The tender is critically incomplete due to the stated absence of any attached documents and content. Bidders cannot access the official Application Form (Appendix 1), the technical-financial offer form, or any supporting documentation, rendering the tender effectively unbiddable.

•No tender documents (0 total) are attached or accessible.
•Official Application Form (Appendix 1) and technical-financial offer form are unavailable.
Fairness40/100

The restricted document access creates a significant barrier to entry, making it impossible for all potential bidders to compete on an equal footing. This lack of transparency could lead to an unfair bidding environment, potentially favoring those with prior, non-public information.

•Restricted document access creates an unfair bidding environment.
•Lack of detailed specifications makes it difficult for bidders to propose comparable solutions.
Practicality40/100

From a bidder's perspective, the tender is highly impractical as it is impossible to prepare a compliant and informed bid without access to the official forms, detailed specifications, and full terms and conditions. This will likely deter participation.

•Bidders cannot prepare a compliant offer without access to official forms and documents.
•Unclear what 'necessary resources' entail without further context from tender documents.
Data Consistency100/100

The provided extracted requirements appear internally consistent, and the description matches the title. However, without the full tender documentation, it is impossible to verify consistency across all tender parts.

•Cannot fully assess data consistency due to the absence of complete tender documentation.
Sustainability0/100

There are no explicit sustainability requirements or considerations mentioned in the extracted information, nor is 'green procurement' flagged as a strength by the automated check. This represents a missed opportunity for responsible procurement.

•Absence of any sustainability or green procurement criteria.

Strengths

Clear title and reference number provided.
Organization and type of procurement specified.
Description of the procurement provided.
Basic eligibility and exclusion grounds are outlined.
Single, clear award criterion (lowest price) is stated.

Concerns

Critical absence of all tender documents and content.
Restricted document access, severely hindering bidder participation and transparency.
Lack of detailed technical specifications for the required blackboards/whiteboards.
Estimated value not disclosed, impacting bidder's resource allocation and decision-making.
No explicit sustainability or green procurement considerations.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all official tender documents, including detailed specifications, application forms, and contract drafts.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value to provide transparency and aid bidder planning.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria for the procured supplies to promote responsible procurement practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes