Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Health insurance for employees of SIA "Pansionāts Rokaiži"

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
166638
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
February 25, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
financial offerPrice
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Tender Opening

March 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
66000000 — Financial and insurance services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€139,128
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
1,731 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Health insurance for employees of SIA "Pansionāts Rokaiži"

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for health insurance for SIA 'Pansionāts Rokaiži' employees presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive financial offer, demonstrating clear value for money, and ensuring meticulous adherence to all submission requirements, especially given the unspecified evaluation criteria.

Key Winning Messages

Exceptional Value and Cost-Effectiveness for Pansionāts Rokaiži Employees

Reliable and Comprehensive Health Coverage Tailored to Your Needs

Seamless Administration and Dedicated Support

Key Opportunities
Competitive Pricing Strategy
Clarity on Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
Leveraging Existing Provider Relationships (if applicable)
Key Challenges
Unspecified Evaluation Criteria

Develop a proposal that strongly emphasizes value for money, comprehensive coverage, and ease of administration. If permitted, seek clarification from the contracting authority. Otherwise, assume a strong weighting on price and demonstrable benefits to employees.

Lack of Detailed Technical Specifications

Proactively define a robust and appealing health insurance package that addresses common employee needs within a care/nursing home environment. Highlight flexibility and responsiveness to potential future needs. Ensure the technical proposal is clear, concise, and directly addresses the implied need for employee health insurance.

Potential for Undisclosed Competition

Assume a moderate to high level of competition. Focus on delivering a superior overall bid that balances price, coverage, and service, rather than solely on price.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established health insurance provider with a strong track record in the Latvian market, possessing a robust understanding of employee benefits, a competitive pricing structure, and efficient administrative processes. Experience with similar public sector or healthcare-related entities would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Financial Offer
Adherence to Exclusion Conditions
Compliance with Selection Criteria
Technical Proposal Requirements
Submission Deadline
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably superior cost-benefit ratio for the proposed health insurance plan.
A highly responsive and efficient claims processing system.
A proactive approach to employee well-being and preventative care within the insurance offering.
Exceptional customer service and dedicated account management for SIA 'Pansionāts Rokaiži'.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, a bidder could voluntarily propose initiatives that indirectly support employee well-being, such as promoting mental health resources or offering workshops on healthy living as part of the insurance package, framing it as enhancing employee productivity and reducing absenteeism.
Bid Focus Areas
Financial OfferN/A (assumed high)

Develop a highly competitive pricing model that offers excellent value for money. Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure profitability while remaining attractive. Consider tiered options if the tender allows, showcasing flexibility.

Technical ProposalN/A (assumed significant)

Clearly articulate the scope of coverage, benefits, and any value-added services. Emphasize ease of access, a user-friendly claims process, and a strong network of healthcare providers. Tailor the proposal to the likely needs of employees in a care home setting.

Compliance and AdministrationN/A (assumed critical)

Ensure absolute adherence to all submission requirements and deadlines. Highlight efficient administrative processes and dedicated support to minimize the burden on the contracting authority.

Recommendations6
Develop a Highly Competitive Financial Offer
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of disclosed estimated value and unspecified evaluation criteria, the financial offer is likely to be a primary determinant of success. Conduct thorough market analysis and costings to present a compelling price point that offers exceptional value for money.

Significantly increases the probability of winning by meeting a likely key evaluation factor.
Proactively Address Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a strong weighting on price and demonstrable benefits. Structure the technical proposal to highlight value, comprehensive coverage, and ease of administration. If permitted, seek clarification from the contracting authority.

Ensures the bid is aligned with the likely priorities of the contracting authority, maximizing scoring potential.
Meticulously Review and Comply with All Submission Requirements
HighMed effort

The tender explicitly mentions 'exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.' Absolute adherence to all these is paramount to avoid disqualification. Double-check all documentation and formatting.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered on its merits.
Emphasize Service Excellence and Claims Efficiency
HighMed effort

While price is crucial, differentiate by showcasing a superior claims processing system, responsive customer support, and a dedicated account manager. This demonstrates a commitment to hassle-free service for both the employees and SIA 'Pansionāts Rokaiži'.

Adds qualitative value beyond price, making the offer more attractive.
Define a Robust Health Insurance Package
MediumMed effort

Given the lack of detailed technical specifications, proactively define a comprehensive and appealing health insurance package that addresses the likely needs of employees in a care home environment. Highlight flexibility and potential for customization.

Ensures the proposed solution is relevant and meets implied needs, even without explicit detail.
Integrate Employee Well-being Initiatives
LowLow effort

Although social aspects are marked as 'No', consider including optional elements like mental health support or wellness resources within the insurance package. Frame these as contributing to employee productivity and reducing absenteeism, indirectly benefiting the employer.

Adds a subtle layer of value and demonstrates a forward-thinking approach, potentially appealing to the employer's broader interests.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on essential coverage and service quality. Highlight the long-term value and reliability of the proposed health insurance plan. Emphasize a partnership approach, demonstrating a commitment to understanding and meeting the specific needs of SIA 'Pansionāts Rokaiži' employees.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission deadline: 2026-03-12T09:00:00
--Requirements include exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.
--The tender requires a financial offer.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None specified in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166638_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260225085906.pdf -- 94.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for a health insurance procurement for "Pansionāts Rokaiži" employees.

Nolikums, tehniskā specifikācija un finanšu piedāvājumsDOC
Nolikums veselības apdrošināšana 2026.doc -- 123.5 KB

This document contains the regulations, technical specifications, and financial offer for a health insurance tender for "Pansionāts Rokaiži" employees.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for employee health insurance is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure and a specified CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and no disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key documents like technical specifications and financial offer templates are provided, contributing to a good understanding of the requirements. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing.

•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the contract duration and deadlines. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders.

•Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The requirements are not tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and the potential for restricted document access (as flagged) could be perceived as fairness concerns.

•Restricted document access (potential)
•Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified.

•Contract start date not specified
•Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

•No green procurement mentioned
•No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
E-Procurement enabled
Reasonable submission deadline
Key documents provided (technical spec, financial offer template)

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential for restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes