Skip to main content
Tenders

Lowestoft Dynamic Purchasing System

Open
Deadline
2217 days left
April 21, 2032
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
010392-2022
Value
£61,500,000
Location
East Anglia, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

April 21, 2022

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2032

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2032

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£61,500,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
East Anglia
Type
Restricted Procedure
63
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

East Suffolk Council is inviting interested suppliers to support the delivery of the multi-million-pound Lowestoft Town Investment Plan, by joining a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) to provide Works and Services in the town and surrounding area. Projects within the Lowestoft Town Investment Plan, along with any similar projects which may arise in the future and fall within the programme scope, will be grouped into lots. Suppliers, once qualified, may bid for individual tenders under the lots in the DPS. Pre-qualified suppliers will be able to see, and be notified of, all advertised projects in a lot and submit a tender response. The DPS will provide a full range of procurement activities over the next 10 years- projects on all lots will be of varying sizes and will provide exciting contracts for large and small, local, regional and national providers throughout the lifetime of the Lowestoft Investment Plan. The DPS will be hosted by In-tend eSourcing systems and will be a fully electr

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Suppliers must submit their application to join the DPS through the In-tend eSourcing systems.
--The application to join the DPS must be submitted by the deadline of 2032-04-21 13:35:00.
--Suppliers must complete the required qualification process to be admitted to the DPS.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information summary.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Suppliers must be interested in providing construction works and services to support the Lowestoft Town Investment Plan.
--Suppliers must be capable of delivering works and services within the construction CPV category.
--Suppliers must be able to operate in Lowestoft and its surrounding area.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Suppliers must demonstrate the necessary technical capability and experience to deliver construction works and services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance levels) are detailed in the provided tender information summary.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
010392-2022_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice announcing East Suffolk Council's establishment of a 10-year Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for construction works and services to support the Lowestoft Town Investment Plan, inviting suppliers to qualify and bid for future projects.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for construction works supporting the Lowestoft Town Investment Plan. While the DPS model offers flexibility, the provided information is critically incomplete, lacking essential documentation and detailed requirements.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Legal compliance is severely hampered by the absence of full tender documents and specific mandatory exclusion grounds. The classification as 'Restricted procedure' for a DPS, which is an open procedure, is also a significant inconsistency that requires clarification.

Absence of full tender documents and content.
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Clarity40/100

The overall purpose of the DPS is clear, but the lack of detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and financial standing significantly reduces the clarity for potential suppliers on what is expected for qualification. The conflicting procedural classification adds to the confusion.

Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Conflicting procedural classification ('Restricted' for a DPS).
Completeness75/100

The tender information is critically incomplete. Key elements such as full tender documents, detailed financial and technical requirements, mandatory exclusion grounds, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing from the provided summary.

No documents attached or content available.
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness60/100

While the DPS model generally promotes fairness by allowing continuous entry, the absence of clear, detailed requirements and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness of the qualification process. This lack of transparency could lead to subjective assessments.

Lack of clear and detailed qualification and evaluation criteria, potentially leading to subjective assessments.
Practicality20/100

The DPS model is practical for managing a long-term investment plan with varied projects. However, the current lack of detailed information makes it impractical for suppliers to prepare a meaningful application without the full tender documents.

Impractical for suppliers to apply effectively due to missing detailed requirements and full documents.
Data Consistency100/100

A significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the description of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), which is an open procedure. The automated check indicating 'No e-submission' contradicts the description of using 'In-tend eSourcing systems'.

Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and DPS classification.
Contradiction regarding e-submission (automated check vs. description).
Sustainability0/100

The tender summary does not include any green procurement or social criteria, representing a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives into a multi-million-pound, long-term investment plan.

Absence of green procurement criteria.
Absence of social criteria.

Strengths

Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for flexibility and continuous market access over 10 years.
Clear objective: supporting the multi-million-pound Lowestoft Town Investment Plan.
Projects will be grouped into lots, catering to varying sizes of providers (large and small).
Uses an eSourcing system (In-tend) for application and tender management.

Concerns

Critical absence of full tender documents, making comprehensive assessment and supplier participation impossible.
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial/technical requirements.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria for DPS qualification and subsequent tenders.
Inconsistency in procedure type: listed as 'Restricted' while describing a DPS (an open procedure).
Absence of any specified green procurement or social criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish the complete tender documentation, including detailed terms, conditions, and all specific requirements.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for both DPS qualification and subsequent project-specific tenders.
3. Clarify the procedural classification (Restricted vs. DPS) to ensure legal accuracy and avoid confusion for potential suppliers.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline