Construction supervision for the object 'Simplified reconstruction of the Culture House at Tautas Street 1, Zilupe, Ludza Municipality'

This tender for construction supervision services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it suffers from restricted document access and a lack of specified evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

The description of the service is clear, and the existence of documented requirements is indicated. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the main notice reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. Key documents like the contract draft and requirements are referenced. However, the restricted access to some documents hinders full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open procedure with disclosed value and reasonable deadlines. The use of e-procurement is positive. However, restricted document access and the lack of specified evaluation criteria raise concerns about full transparency and fairness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This area is underdeveloped.