Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Supported Living Care Services for Working Age Adults with a Learning Disability

Open
Deadline
217 days left
December 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
026800-2026
Value
£6,032,674
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
April 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

November 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

December 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£6,032,674
Duration
60 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

East Sussex County Council Supported Living Care Services provision for working age adults with a learning disability at Warwick House and Steyne Road, Seaford, East Sussex. East Sussex County Council is recommissioning it's supported living care services through a Competitive Flexible Procedure at Warwick House and Steyne Road, Seaford for a new contract with a Service Commencement date of December 2026. The Council is seeking to appoint a single care and support provider.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
026800-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
026800-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
026800-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Supported Living Care Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure type is specified. The deadline, while potentially short given the contract start date, is present. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the services and the target group is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the lack of accessible tender document content means crucial details for a complete understanding are missing.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and specifies a competitive flexible procedure, promoting fairness. The requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are standard. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender lacks explicit information regarding e-submission, which is a significant drawback for modern procurement. The absence of a document URL for the full tender package further hinders practical access.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Proper CPV code provided
Competitive flexible procedure indicated

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
No explicit e-submission method detailed
Lack of accessible tender document content
No mention of sustainability or innovation aspects

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
2. Provide details on the e-submission process and a direct link to tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation elements into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline