Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Conducting an Adobe InDesign course

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00170981/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubuskie, Poland
Published
June 06, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubuskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,802
Avg. Bids
0.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
53%
6,312 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Conducting an Adobe InDesign course

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Adobe InDesign training presents a moderate competition opportunity. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements necessitates a proactive approach to defining value and demonstrating expertise. A winning bid will focus on clear, demonstrable training outcomes and a competitive pricing strategy.

Key Winning Messages

Expert-led, outcome-focused Adobe InDesign training that empowers participants.

Cost-effective and efficient training solutions tailored to the needs of the Lubuskie Counties Association.

Reliable and experienced training partner committed to participant success.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for defining value proposition.
Opportunity to propose flexible delivery methods (online/in-person) to meet diverse needs.
Potential for strong differentiation through instructor expertise and course customization.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed technical and evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid precisely.

Proactively define and articulate clear learning objectives, expected outcomes, and the methodology that will ensure successful training delivery. Assume a focus on practical skills and participant proficiency.

Unknown competitor landscape and estimated value can lead to pricing uncertainty.

Conduct market research to benchmark typical InDesign training costs. Offer a competitive yet profitable price, potentially with tiered options if feasible, and clearly justify the value proposition.

Limited information on eligibility and financial requirements requires careful review of provided documents.

Thoroughly review all provided documents (SWZ, Offer Form, Contract) for any implicit or explicit requirements. Ensure all mandatory declarations are completed accurately and without omissions.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An ideal bidder is a specialized training provider with a proven track record in delivering Adobe Creative Suite courses, specifically InDesign. They should possess experienced, certified instructors, a flexible delivery model (online/in-person), and the ability to tailor content to the specific needs of the ZWIĄZEK POWIATÓW LUBUSKICH (Lubuskie Counties Association). Strong proposal writing skills and a clear understanding of public sector procurement are also essential.
Key Requirements
Demonstrate capability to deliver Adobe InDesign training.
Adherence to mandatory exclusion grounds.
Submission of required documentation (Offer Form, Declarations).
Understanding and acceptance of the draft contract terms.
Key Discriminators
Highly experienced and certified Adobe InDesign instructors with a strong portfolio of successful training delivery.
Demonstrable ability to tailor course content to the specific needs and skill levels of participants from a public sector association.
A clear and compelling training methodology that emphasizes practical application and measurable skill development.
A competitive and transparent pricing structure that clearly outlines value for money.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to providing accessible training materials and methods to accommodate participants with diverse learning needs, thereby promoting inclusivity within the Lubuskie Counties Association.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Implicit)

Detail the qualifications and experience of instructors, outline the training methodology, and provide examples of successful past training programs. Emphasize practical exercises and real-world application of InDesign skills.

Price

Develop a competitive pricing strategy based on market research and the defined value proposition. Ensure transparency in pricing and highlight cost-effectiveness.

Understanding of Contract Terms

Thoroughly review the draft contract (Zaê. nr 5 - Wzór umowy.docx) and ensure the bid fully aligns with all stipulated terms and conditions. Highlight any areas where the bidder's approach exceeds minimum requirements.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze All Tender Documents
CriticalHigh effort

Despite limited AI extraction, meticulously review all provided documents (SWZ, Offer Form, Contract, Declarations) for any explicit or implicit requirements regarding eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission format. Pay close attention to the draft contract for any specific obligations.

Ensures compliance and avoids disqualification.
Define and Articulate Value Proposition
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, proactively define what constitutes success for this training. Focus on measurable outcomes, participant skill enhancement, and the practical application of Adobe InDesign. Frame the bid around these benefits.

Guides the bid's focus and strengthens its persuasive power.
Showcase Instructor Expertise and Customization
HighMed effort

Highlight the qualifications, certifications, and relevant experience of your InDesign instructors. Emphasize your ability to tailor the course content, duration, and delivery methods (online/in-person) to the specific needs of the ZWIĄZEK POWIATÓW LUBUSKICH.

Sets the bidder apart from generic training providers.
Develop a Competitive and Transparent Pricing Strategy
HighMed effort

Conduct market research to understand typical pricing for InDesign training. Present a clear, competitive price that reflects the value offered. Consider breaking down costs to demonstrate transparency and cost-effectiveness.

Increases attractiveness and perceived value.
Address Potential Ambiguities Proactively
MediumLow effort

If any requirements remain unclear after reviewing the documents, consider submitting a clarification request to the contracting authority well in advance of the deadline. This demonstrates diligence and ensures accurate bid preparation.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and improves bid quality.
Integrate Inclusivity in Training Delivery
MediumLow effort

While 'Social Aspects' are marked 'No', subtly weave in a commitment to inclusive training practices, such as providing accessible materials or offering flexible learning options, to demonstrate a broader understanding of public service delivery.

Adds a positive, forward-thinking element to the bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a specialized, outcome-driven training partner rather than just a service provider. Emphasize the tangible benefits participants will gain from the InDesign course, such as improved efficiency in document creation and design.
Highlight flexibility in delivery and customization as key advantages, suggesting that the bidder can adapt to the specific operational needs of the Lubuskie Counties Association, unlike more rigid competitors.
Leverage any past experience with public sector clients or similar organizations to build credibility and demonstrate an understanding of their procurement processes and expectations.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a5f-338f-8b04-056e-e50001aab5fb.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for conducting an Adobe InDesign course, co-financed by the European Social Fund, with evaluation criteria based on price and completion time.

zaê. nr 1 do SWZ Formularz oferty.docxDOC
zaê. nr 1 do SWZ Formularz oferty.docx -- 792.7 KB

No content extracted

Zaê. nr 2 do SWZ - Opis przedmiotu zamówienia.docxDOC
Zaê. nr 2 do SWZ - Opis przedmiotu zamówienia... -- 787.5 KB

No content extracted

zaê. nr 3 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie o niepodleganiu wykluczeniu.docxDOC
zaê. nr 3 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie o niepodleganiu... -- 827.2 KB

No content extracted

Zaê. nr 4 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie dot. grupy kapitaêowej.docxDOC
Zaê. nr 4 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie dot. grupy kapi... -- 788.6 KB

No content extracted

Zaê. nr 5 - Wzór umowy.docxDOC
Zaê. nr 5 - Wzór umowy.docx -- 805.4 KB

No content extracted

Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdfPDF
Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for conducting an Adobe InDesign course, co-financed by the European Union, with evaluation criteria based on price and completion time.

SWZ.docxDOC
SWZ.docx

This document contains the specifications for a public procurement tender for an Adobe InDesign course, including tender procedures, requirements, and contract details.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an Adobe InDesign course is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documentation. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, and the submission deadline appears very short.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, CPV code, and a clear procedure type. However, the extremely short submission deadline raises concerns about reasonable timeframes, and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be a compliance issue in some jurisdictions.

Submission deadline may be too short
Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the subject of the procurement. The availability of multiple documents, including a description of the subject matter and a contract template, contributes to clarity. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, and financial requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No eligibility requirements specified
No technical capability requirements specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the title, organization, and submission deadline is present. The tender also indicates the presence of 8 documents, suggesting a comprehensive set of attachments. However, the estimated value and contract duration are not disclosed, and crucial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted list.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of all documents suggests full access for bidders. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria could potentially lead to less transparent decision-making.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. The presence of a submission deadline is noted. However, the lack of disclosed financing information, contract start date, and contract duration limits the practical assessment for potential bidders.

No e-submission details provided
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided, and the status is active. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender notice mentions co-financing by the European Social Fund and the European Union, indicating potential adherence to EU funding requirements. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Reference number and organization specified
CPV code provided
Multiple tender documents available
E-Procurement indicated

Concerns

Very short submission deadline
Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements

Recommendations

1. Extend the submission deadline to allow adequate bidder response time.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Clearly define the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline