Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Pakalpojumu pieteikumu un projektu pārvaldības rīka/licenču iegāde

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
162834
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
December 23, 2025
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 23, 2025

Deadline for Questions

January 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 16, 2026

Tender Opening

January 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
48000000 — Software package and information systems
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
63
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€171,259
Avg. Bids
1.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
736 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Pakalpojumu pieteikumu un projektu pārvaldības rīka/licenču iegāde

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (6)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Offers must be submitted electronically via the EIS e-konkursu system.
--The submission must include an application, qualification documents, a technical offer, and a financial offer.
--All documents must be prepared according to the specified annexes/templates (Appendix 2 for Technical Offer, Appendix 3 for Experience, Appendix 4 for Financial Offer).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have ties to certain countries as specified in the qualification criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must demonstrate relevant experience by completing Appendix 3, detailing past projects.
--Bidders must attach supporting documents (client references, certified copies of handover-acceptance acts, or contract excerpts) to unequivocally confirm the described experience.
--Bidders must be authorized to supply the proposed products.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The proposed solution must meet specified functional, architectural, infrastructure, and security requirements.
--Bidders must clearly distinguish between mandatory and desirable features in their technical offer.
--The delivery of the service request and project management tool/licenses must be completed within two months of contract signing.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--All submitted prices must be comprehensive, covering all contract execution costs, including acquisition, transport, taxes (excluding VAT), and potential risks.
--All prices must be presented with two decimal places.
--The financial offer must be prepared using Appendix 4.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

1.pielikums_Pieteikums dalībai iepirkumāDOC
1.pielikums_Pieteikums dalībai iepirkumā

No summary available for this document.

2.pielikums_Tehniskā specifikācija - pretendenta piedāvājumsDOC
2.pielikums_Tehniskā specifikācija - pretende...

This document is Appendix 2, serving as the Technical Specification and Bidder's Offer template for the acquisition of a service request and project management tool/licenses for the Parliament of the Republic of Latvia. Bidders are required to detail how their proposed solution meets the specified functional, architectural, infrastructure, and security requirements. The document provides a structured format for bidders to describe their compliance, distinguishing between mandatory and desirable features, and providing references to supporting documentation.

3.pielikums_Pretendenta pieredzes aprakstsDOC
3.pielikums_Pretendenta pieredzes apraksts

This document is Appendix 3 to the tender regulations, titled "Description of Tenderer's Experience." Bidders are required to complete a table detailing their relevant experience to demonstrate compliance with the requirements outlined in point 4.1.4 of the procurement regulations. Supporting documents, such as client references, certified copies of handover-acceptance acts, or contract excerpts, must be attached to unequivocally confirm the described experience.

4.pielikums_Finanšu piedāvājumsDOC
4.pielikums_Finanšu piedāvājums

This document, Appendix 4, serves as the Financial Proposal template for the tender "Acquisition of a service application and project management tool/licenses." It mandates that all submitted prices must be comprehensive, covering all contract execution costs, including acquisition, transport, taxes (excluding VAT), and potential risks. Bidders are also required to present all prices with two decimal places.

5.pielikums_Līguma projektsDOC
5.pielikums_Līguma projekts

This document is a draft contract for the acquisition of a service application and project management tool/licenses by the Latvian Parliament (Saeima). It outlines the terms for product delivery, payment, quality assurance, and the rights and obligations of both the supplier and the client. Key provisions include a two-month delivery timeframe, strict compliance with technical specifications and Latvian laws, and specific conditions regarding subcontractor involvement and information security. The contract also details penalty clauses for non-performance and conditions for unilateral termination.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaDOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija

This document outlines the comprehensive requirements for the procurement of project management tools/licenses for the Parliament of the Republic of Latvia. It details bidder qualification criteria, including restrictions on ties to certain countries, experience requirements, and authorization to supply products. The document also specifies the structure for technical and financial proposals and the evaluation criteria, which prioritize price (80%) and technical quality (20%).

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums

This document outlines the regulations for an open competition to acquire a service request and project management tool/licenses for the Parliament of Latvia. Bidders must submit electronic offers via the EIS e-konkursu system, including an application, qualification documents, a technical offer, and a financial offer, all prepared according to specified annexes. The most economically advantageous offer will be selected based on criteria such as price, client portal availability, control schedule, customer satisfaction, scalability, and mobile access, with delivery required within two months of contract signing.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a service request and project management tool suffers from critical deficiencies, primarily the complete absence of tender documents and appendices, making it impossible for bidders to submit compliant offers. The short contract duration and undisclosed estimated value further raise concerns about fairness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender outlines mandatory exclusion grounds and requires compliance with Latvian laws. However, the lack of full documentation, particularly regarding 'ties to certain countries,' prevents a comprehensive assessment of legal adherence.

Clarity40/100

The tender's clarity is severely compromised by the complete absence of referenced appendices (2, 3, 4) and detailed specifications. The description is minimal, the CPV code is overly broad for 'supplies,' and an incomplete sentence exists in the submission requirements.

Completeness75/100

This tender is critically incomplete due to the total absence of all tender documents and appendices. Key information such as the estimated value, NUTS code, and explicit evaluation criteria are also missing, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive offer.

Fairness40/100

The complete lack of tender documents and the undisclosed estimated value fundamentally undermine fairness. The extremely short 2-month contract duration for delivery and implementation of a new system could unfairly restrict competition to a very limited pool of pre-qualified or pre-selected vendors, raising concerns about potential tailoring.

Practicality40/100

The 2-month contract duration for the delivery and implementation of a service request and project management tool is highly ambitious and likely impractical for a new system, potentially leading to rushed execution or project failure.

Data Consistency100/100

The tender is classified as 'supplies' but uses a broad 'services' CPV code (8), indicating a minor inconsistency in classification.

Sustainability0/100

No specific characteristics or green procurement considerations are mentioned, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability aspects.

Strengths

Open procedure specified
Electronic submission via EIS e-konkursu system
Clear structure for offers (if appendices were available)
Comprehensive financial offer requirements
Distinction between mandatory and desirable features

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents and appendices (critical issue)
Undisclosed estimated value
Very short 2-month contract duration for delivery/implementation, indicating potential tailoring
Lack of detailed specifications and explicit evaluation criteria
Broad and inconsistent CPV code (8 for 'supplies')

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all missing tender documents and appendices, ensuring full access.
2. Disclose the estimated value to enhance transparency and allow informed bidder decisions.
3. Review and justify the contract duration for practicality, or extend it to allow for realistic implementation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes