Tenders

Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park (QEOP) Advertising Concession

Open
Deadline
12 days left
March 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
015468-2026
Value
£180,000
Location
Inner London - East, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 12, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£180,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - East
Type
Other
65
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The London Legacy Development Corporation is seeking a Media Agency partner to sell digital advertising content on its assets within the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and the London Aquatics Centre. This concession aims to maximize revenue from these assets and achieve the best financial outcome for both parties.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted electronically via the Delta eSourcing portal.
--The submission deadline is 2026-03-15T00:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidding entity must be a Media Agency.
--The bidder must demonstrate capability in selling digital advertising content.
--The bidder must demonstrate capability in maximizing revenue from advertising assets.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must propose a financial model designed to maximize revenue from the specified assets.
--The bidder's financial proposal must aim to achieve the best financial outcome for both the London Legacy Development Corporation and the partner.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides clear basic information and supports electronic submission, but suffers from significant incompleteness due to missing evaluation criteria, detailed eligibility/exclusion grounds, and the lack of content for attached documents. Its fairness is compromised by the absence of transparent evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined. There are no reported disputes. However, the missing reveal date and the explicit absence of detailed eligibility, exclusion, and evaluation criteria in the provided summary are significant transparency and compliance gaps, even for a below-threshold tender.

Missing tender reveal date.
No detailed mandatory exclusion grounds specified.
Clarity55/100

The overall objective and service description are clear. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria, detailed eligibility/exclusion grounds, and specific performance conditions significantly reduces the clarity for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Completeness60/100

Basic information, key dates, and estimated value are provided. However, the critical lack of content for the 9 listed tender documents, coupled with the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility/exclusion grounds, makes this tender significantly incomplete from a bidder's perspective.

No content provided for the 9 listed tender documents.
No evaluation criteria specified.
Fairness65/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and electronic submission is supported, which promotes equal access. The requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the critical absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely impacts the fairness and objectivity of the procurement process, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection.

No evaluation criteria specified, severely impacting transparency and objectivity.
Lack of content for listed tender documents in the summary raises concerns about full information access.
Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is clearly supported via a dedicated portal, and direct links are provided. The contract start date and duration are specified, making it practical for bidders to plan their engagement.

Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and 'Code' for Type/Procedure, and the missing reveal date.

Missing 'Liable Person' field.
Missing 'Code' for Type and Procedure fields.
Sustainability20/100

There is no mention of any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. This indicates a significant lack of integration of modern sustainability principles.

No green procurement aspects mentioned.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear description of the service required.
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal is supported.
Key financial and timeline details (value, duration, start date) are specified.
CPV code is correctly assigned.
Value is disclosed and not classified.

Concerns

Critical absence of evaluation criteria.
Lack of detailed eligibility and mandatory exclusion grounds.
No content provided for the 9 listed tender documents.
Missing reveal date for the tender.
No mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects.

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive evaluation criteria, including weighting and methodology, to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide full tender documentation with detailed eligibility and exclusion grounds to ensure completeness.
3. Clearly state performance indicators and how revenue maximization will be measured to enhance clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline