Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Supply of Forest Reproductive Material

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
162708
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
December 21, 2025
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 21, 2025

Deadline for Questions

January 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 23, 2026

Tender Opening

January 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
48 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Supplies
63
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€24,627
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
2,503 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of forest reproductive material.

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-01-23 11:00:00.
--No variant bids will be accepted.
--Bids must conform to all requirements outlined in the tender documents (even if not detailed in this summary).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by applicable public procurement law (e.g., bankruptcy, insolvency, serious professional misconduct, non-payment of taxes or social security contributions).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be legally established and authorized to perform the contract in their country of registration.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be capable of supplying 'forest reproductive material' as per the tender description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be financially capable of fulfilling the contract for the supply of forest reproductive material.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaDOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija

No summary available for this document.

Līguma projektsDOC
Līguma projekts

No summary available for this document.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums

No summary available for this document.

Tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
Tehniskā specifikācija

No summary available for this document.

Vispārīgās vienošanās projektsDOC
Vispārīgās vienošanās projekts

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender suffers from a severe lack of essential documentation and detailed requirements, making it highly opaque and challenging for potential bidders to prepare a compliant and competitive offer. The absence of tender documents and evaluation criteria is a critical flaw.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender outlines mandatory exclusion and basic eligibility grounds, which is standard. However, the absence of full tender documents and explicit evaluation criteria raises significant concerns regarding transparency, equal treatment, and adherence to public procurement principles.

•No full tender documents available
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Clarity40/100

The clarity of requirements is extremely poor. Technical and financial capabilities are described in overly general terms without any specific metrics, standards, or scope of supply. This makes it impossible for bidders to understand what is truly required.

•Vague technical capability requirements
•Vague financial capability requirements
Completeness75/100

The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any attached documents, detailed specifications, estimated value, and evaluation criteria means bidders lack fundamental information required to formulate a meaningful bid.

•No tender documents attached
•No detailed scope of work/supply
Fairness40/100

The extreme lack of detail and absence of tender documents severely compromises fairness and equal treatment. It creates an environment where only bidders with prior knowledge or internal information could realistically submit a competitive offer, raising strong concerns about potential tailoring.

•Vague requirements allow for subjective interpretation
•Lack of documents hinders fair competition
Practicality40/100

It is highly impractical for any bidder to prepare a comprehensive and compliant bid based solely on the provided summary. The contracting authority will also face significant challenges in objectively evaluating bids without clear criteria and detailed specifications, increasing the risk of disputes.

•Impossible for bidders to prepare detailed offers
•Difficult for contracting authority to evaluate objectively
Data Consistency100/100

While no direct contradictions are evident, the CPV code '9' is excessively broad for 'forest reproductive material,' indicating a lack of precision in classification and potential inconsistency with the specific nature of the procurement.

•CPV code is too broad for the specific tender description
Sustainability0/100

There are no indications or requirements related to environmental, social, or other sustainability aspects within the provided information, as also flagged by the automated check.

•No sustainability criteria or considerations

Strengths

Basic tender information (title, reference, organization, type, status) is provided
The procedure is open, promoting broader participation
Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents
Extremely vague technical and financial capability requirements
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Broad and imprecise CPV code

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents detailing the scope of supply, technical specifications, and delivery requirements.
2. Clearly define objective and measurable technical, financial, and selection/award criteria.
3. Disclose the estimated contract value and specify a more precise CPV code.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes