Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Valsts ugunsdzēsības un glābšanas dienesta Ugunsdrošības un civilās aizsardzības koledžas mācību kompleksa I.kārtas īstenošanai- Inženierkonsultantu pakalpojuma iegāde

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
157883
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
December 21, 2025
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 21, 2025

Deadline for Questions

January 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 21, 2026

Tender Opening

January 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
71000000 — Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
29 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
64
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Valsts ugunsdzēsības un glābšanas dienesta Ugunsdrošības un civilās aizsardzības koledžas mācību kompleksa I.kārtas īstenošanai- Inženierkonsultantu pakalpojuma iegāde
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-01-21 10:00:00.
--Variants are not accepted.
--Specific submission documents, forms, and content requirements are not provided in the available information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for detailed instructions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not provided in the available information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for details on grounds such as bankruptcy, insolvency, grave professional misconduct, non-payment of taxes/social security contributions, etc., as per national procurement laws.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific eligibility requirements (e.g., legal form, registration, licenses) are not provided in the available information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific technical capability requirements (e.g., experience, personnel qualifications, equipment) are not provided in the available information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents. The service type is "Engineering Consultancy" for a college complex project.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum annual turnover, financial ratios, bid security) are not provided in the available information. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaDOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija

No summary available for this document.

Nolikums_2025_104DOC
Nolikums_2025_104

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for engineering consultancy services is severely lacking in publicly available detailed information, making a comprehensive assessment challenging and posing significant transparency and fairness concerns for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

While the basic tender structure is present, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in the provided information, coupled with restricted document access, raises significant concerns regarding compliance with transparency and non-discrimination principles of public procurement law.

•Restricted document access
•Absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in provided information
Clarity40/100

The tender's title and general description are clear, but the complete absence of specific requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical capabilities, financial standing, and submission documents renders the tender highly unclear for potential bidders based on the available information.

•Lack of specific details for all key requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission documents)
Completeness75/100

The provided tender information is critically incomplete. Essential details required for bidders to understand the scope, prepare a compliant bid, and assess their suitability are entirely missing, as indicated by 'No documents attached' and 'No document content available'.

•No documents attached
•No document content available
Fairness40/100

The restricted document access and the absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria in the publicly available information create a substantial risk to fairness and equal treatment. This lack of transparency could lead to a perception of tailored requirements or arbitrary decision-making.

•Restricted document access
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100

From a bidder's perspective, the tender as presented is highly impractical. The necessity to seek out full tender documents externally, which are not directly provided, creates an unnecessary administrative burden and barrier to participation.

•Restricted document access, requiring bidders to seek out full documents externally
•Unnecessary barrier to participation due to lack of readily available information
Data Consistency100/100

The basic descriptive data points (title, reference, organization, type, procedure, status, CPV, EU Funded, contract duration) are internally consistent. However, the consistency with the full tender documents cannot be assessed due to restricted access.

•Inability to assess consistency with full tender documents due to restricted access
Sustainability25/100

The provided information does not include any specific sustainability requirements or considerations. The automated check also indicates that it is 'Not green procurement'.

•No sustainability requirements mentioned
•Not identified as green procurement

Strengths

Clear title and description of the service
Reference number and organization specified
Open procedure type, generally promoting competition
EU Funded status, indicating potential for broader interest
Contract duration is specified

Concerns

Restricted document access and no documents attached, severely hindering transparency and competition
Absence of all specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission documents) in the provided information
Missing evaluation criteria, preventing bidders from understanding assessment methodology
Estimated value not disclosed, limiting commercial assessment for bidders
Risk of tailored requirements due to lack of publicly available detailed information

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents, including detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, are publicly accessible and attached to the tender notice.
2. Disclose the estimated value to enhance transparency and aid bidder decision-making.
3. Clearly articulate all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements within the accessible tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes