MBC000631 MBC Events Tea Support and Infrastructure Arrangements

This tender offers a clear description of services required for event support and infrastructure, with a reasonable estimated value and duration. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open competition procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes are reported.

The description of the services required for event support and infrastructure is clear and provides context on the Middlesbrough Council's events team activities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and the absence of content in the tender documents significantly reduce completeness.

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is below threshold, which is standard. However, the lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria could inadvertently favor bidders with prior knowledge or experience with the organization.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of document content make the practical aspects of the submission process unclear and potentially cumbersome.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.