Tenders

Highways Operatives Training Brokerage Service

Open
Deadline
6 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
010988-2026
Value
£325,000
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 12, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£325,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Type
Other
67
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Bedford Borough Council (“the Authority”) requires a competent and experienced Training Brokerage Service Provider (“the Provider”) to coordinate, procure, and deliver a comprehensive programme of highways-related training. This service will support approximately 40 operatives, inspectors, and supervisory staff employed by the Authority, in addition to staff from other internal teams (e.g., Grounds Maintenance) as required.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-09T12:00:00+00:00.
--Provide a price proposal for evaluation (80% weighting).
--Provide a quality proposal for evaluation (20% weighting).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Be a legal entity capable of entering into a contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Demonstrate competence and experience as a Training Brokerage Service Provider.
--Be capable of coordinating, procuring, and delivering a comprehensive programme of highways-related training.
--Have the capacity to support approximately 40 operatives, inspectors, and supervisory staff, plus additional staff from other internal teams (e.g., Grounds Maintenance).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a competitive price proposal.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
010988-2026_ocds_record.json

This document is an OCDS record providing machine-readable data about Bedford Borough Council's tender for a Training Brokerage Service Provider to coordinate and deliver highways-related training for its staff.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
010988-2026_ocds_release.json

This document is an OCDS Release Package providing structured data about the Bedford Borough Council's tender for a highways-related training brokerage service.

Official PDF VersionPDF
010988-2026_official.pdf

Bedford Borough Council seeks an experienced provider to coordinate, procure, and deliver comprehensive highways-related training for approximately 40 staff, with an estimated value of £325,000 over three to five years.

Tender NoticeHTM
010988-2026.html

Bedford Borough Council seeks an experienced Training Brokerage Service Provider to coordinate and deliver comprehensive highways-related training for approximately 40 staff, with an estimated value of £325,000, evaluated on an 80% price / 20% quality basis.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear service description and basic procurement details, but suffers from a lack of detailed evaluation sub-criteria, absence of e-submission, and no explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the 'Open procedure' and assigns a relevant CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. While 'Mandatory exclusion grounds' are mentioned as a category, specific details are not provided in the summary, which is a minor gap.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summary.
Clarity70/100

The service description is clear and unambiguous, and the overall evaluation weighting (80% price / 20% quality) is specified. However, the lack of detailed sub-criteria for the quality component and generic technical requirements reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Lack of detailed sub-criteria for the 20% quality evaluation component.
Technical capability requirements are generic ('Demonstrate competence and experience') without specific measurable criteria.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, value, duration, and contract start date, is present. Documents are available. However, the tender lacks comprehensive details regarding mandatory exclusion grounds and the sub-criteria for quality evaluation, impacting its overall completeness.

Missing detailed sub-criteria for the quality evaluation component.
Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed.
Fairness60/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) creates a barrier to equal access, and the lack of detailed sub-criteria for quality evaluation introduces subjectivity, potentially compromising transparency and fairness.

Absence of electronic submission (e-submission).
Lack of detailed sub-criteria for the quality evaluation component, which can lead to subjective assessment.
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

No electronic submission (e-submission) supported.
Data Consistency80/100

Key fields are generally populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the value being disclosed.

Empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'.
Inconsistency with 'Value Classified: Yes' while the estimated value is explicitly disclosed.
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear service description and scope.
Estimated value, duration, and contract start date are specified.
Procedure type (Open) and CPV code are clearly defined.
All basic organizational and reference information is present.
Tender documents are available and summarized.

Concerns

Lack of detailed sub-criteria for quality evaluation (20% weighting).
Absence of electronic submission (e-submission).
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the summary.
Generic technical requirements lacking specific measurable criteria.
No explicit integration of green, social, or innovation sustainability aspects.

Recommendations

1. Develop and publish clear, objective sub-criteria for the quality evaluation component to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Implement electronic submission capabilities to improve accessibility and efficiency for bidders.
3. Provide explicit details for mandatory exclusion grounds and more specific technical capability requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline