Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login7 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
4 documents available with AI summaries
This OCDS record provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the tender for heating improvement works at Rowley Way Estate, including contracting authority information and tender publication details.
This OCDS Release Package provides the official, structured data for the London Borough of Camden's restricted tender seeking a works contractor for comprehensive heating system upgrades at Rowley Way Estate.
This tender notice from London Borough of Camden outlines requirements for a works contractor to undertake a £11.4M heating system upgrade at Rowley Way Estate, requiring a minimum turnover of £35M, a current ratio of at least 0.6, and three case studies demonstrating relevant experience.
This tender notice outlines a £11.4M contract for heating infrastructure works at Rowley Way Estate, requiring contractors to have a minimum turnover of £35M and a current ratio of at least 0.6 in their two most recent financial years.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender presents a detailed scope of works but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and practical inconsistencies, significantly impacting fairness and legal compliance.
The tender provides a reasonable submission period and correctly assigns CPV codes. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and, more critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal deficiencies. The high financial turnover requirement, while not illegal, could be seen as disproportionate.
The description of the works is detailed and clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. Eligibility requirements are vaguely defined.
Basic information, value, duration, and a detailed scope of works are provided. Documents are listed. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds. The 'Required: No' for qualification documents is also confusing.
The tender provides a very generous submission period and discloses the estimated value. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity. The lack of e-submission creates an unnecessary barrier, and the high financial turnover requirement (£35M for a £11.4M contract) may disproportionately restrict competition to a limited number of large firms.
The tender suffers from a lack of electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is highly impractical and likely an error, indicating a lack of realistic planning for a complex works project.
While many key fields are populated, there are inconsistencies. The contract start date (2026-12-01) is identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical. There is also a discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR (13.68M) and the GBP equivalent (£11.4M) mentioned in document summaries, which should be clearly reconciled. Minor missing codes for type and procedure are also noted.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations into a significant public works contract.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required