Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login7 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the tender requirements for archive document storage, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.
This document contains an application form for participation in an open tender for "Archive Document Storage" and the technical specifications for the service.
This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning archive document storage, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for archive document storage is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.
The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of reported disputes and the active status suggest regulatory compliance. The deadline is within a reasonable timeframe for the estimated value.
The tender title and description are clear. Key requirements are referenced in attached documents, which is a standard practice. However, the explicit listing of evaluation criteria within the main tender notice would enhance clarity.
Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the AI flags 'Restricted document access' and 'No evaluation criteria specified' as issues, indicating potential gaps in the completeness of readily available information for bidders.
The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator of fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern that could limit fair competition.
The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. However, the AI flags 'No e-submission' as an issue, which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The contract duration of 60 months is clearly specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender is active and has a valid period.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required