Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Supply of bags for selective collection of municipal waste in 2026.

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 18, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00150517/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Małopolskie, Poland
Published
August 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 11, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Małopolskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€291,064
Avg. Bids
0.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
83%
867 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of bags for selective collection of municipal waste in 2026.

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires a reliable supply of municipal waste collection bags. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating consistent quality, competitive pricing, and efficient delivery logistics, while proactively addressing potential supply chain risks. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and showcasing operational excellence is crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Consistent Supply of High-Quality Waste Bags

Cost-Effective Solution with Efficient Logistics

Proven Partner for Municipal Waste Management

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to excel in all mandatory and implied qualitative aspects, as these will likely form the basis of the award.
The tender is for a single year (2026), suggesting a need for immediate and consistent supply rather than long-term innovation, favoring established suppliers.
The CPV code (19520000-7 Produkty z tworzyw sztucznych) is broad, allowing for a wide range of bag types and materials as long as they meet the functional requirements for selective waste collection.
Key Challenges
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to pinpoint the exact weighting of different aspects, requiring a balanced approach across all potential areas of assessment.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas, particularly quality, price, and delivery. Prepare a comprehensive bid that addresses all aspects of the tender notice and associated documents thoroughly.

Potential for price-sensitive competition given the lack of other specified differentiators.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify opportunities for competitive pricing without compromising quality. Explore economies of scale and efficient production processes.

Unspecified duration and estimated value could indicate a standard, potentially high-volume contract, requiring significant production and logistical capacity.

Ensure robust production capacity and a well-defined logistics plan that can handle potentially large volumes and ensure timely delivery across the specified region (PL217).

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established manufacturer or distributor of plastic products, specifically waste bags, with a proven track record of supplying public sector entities. The ideal bidder will possess robust production capacity, a strong supply chain network, and the ability to offer competitive pricing while maintaining high-quality standards. Experience in the Polish market and familiarity with local waste management regulations would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Meeting Eligibility Requirements
Demonstrating Technical Capability
Satisfying Financial Requirements
Adhering to Submission Requirements
Product Quality and Specifications (implied by 'worków do selektywnej zbiórki odpadów komunalnych')
Delivery Reliability and Timeliness (implied by 'Dostawa... w 2026 roku')
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in supplying similar products to municipal entities in Poland.
A highly competitive and transparent pricing structure.
A robust quality assurance process for waste bags, ensuring durability and suitability for selective collection.
A clear and efficient logistics plan tailored to the Brzeskie Zakłady Komunalne's location (PL217).
Social Value Opportunities
While 'No Social Aspects' are specified, a bidder could voluntarily highlight their commitment to ethical labor practices in their manufacturing and supply chain, or local employment initiatives if applicable, as a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Mandatory Requirements (Exclusion, Eligibility, Technical, Financial, Submission)

Ensure 100% compliance. Any deviation will lead to disqualification. Dedicate significant resources to meticulously review and complete all required documentation.

Product Quality and SuitabilityImplied High

Provide detailed specifications of the bags, including material, dimensions, strength, and any relevant certifications. Highlight quality control measures during manufacturing.

PriceImplied High

Develop a cost-effective pricing strategy. Consider offering tiered pricing or volume discounts if applicable. Ensure pricing is transparent and competitive.

Delivery and LogisticsImplied High

Outline a clear and reliable delivery schedule and plan. Demonstrate capacity to meet demand throughout 2026. Highlight any logistical advantages for the PL217 region.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Compliance Check
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly review all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements. Ensure all documentation is accurate, complete, and submitted by the deadline.

Prevents disqualification.
Focus on Implied Quality and Reliability
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume quality, price, and delivery reliability will be paramount. Provide detailed product specifications, quality assurance processes, and a robust delivery plan.

Maximizes perceived value and reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority.
Competitive Pricing Strategy
MediumMed effort

Develop a cost-effective pricing model. Analyze competitor pricing if possible and aim for a price that is competitive yet sustainable, ensuring profitability.

Increases chances of winning on price, especially when other criteria are not explicitly weighted.
Clarify Product Specifications
HighMed effort

If the 'ZAŁACZNIK WORKI 2026.rar' or 'SWZ WORKI 2026.doc' contain specific technical requirements for the bags (e.g., material, thickness, load capacity, dimensions), ensure your proposed product meets or exceeds these. If unclear, seek clarification from the contracting authority.

Ensures the bid meets the actual needs of the client.
Supply Chain Resilience
HighMed effort

Outline your supply chain management strategy to ensure uninterrupted supply of raw materials and finished goods throughout 2026. Detail contingency plans for potential disruptions.

Demonstrates reliability and mitigates risk for the contracting authority.
Voluntary Ethical Sourcing Statement
LowLow effort

Include a brief statement about your commitment to ethical labor practices and sustainable manufacturing, even if not explicitly required. This can subtly enhance your company's image.

Minor positive impression, potential differentiator in a close bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most reliable and cost-effective supplier that meets all technical requirements without compromise. Emphasize operational efficiency and a proven track record in delivering essential municipal supplies. Highlight your understanding of the Polish waste management context, even if not explicitly requested.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de7f6d-c2d7-cb25-056e-e50001ac6fcb.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the supply of bags for selective municipal waste collection in 2026, issued by Brzeskie Zakłady Komunalne Sp. z o.o.

SWZ WORKI 2026.docDOC
SWZ WORKI 2026.doc

This document contains the Specific Conditions of the Tender for the supply of municipal waste collection bags in 2026, detailing the tender procedure, requirements for bidders, and submission guidelines.

ZAŁACZNIK WORKI 2026.rarZIP
ZAŁACZNIK WORKI 2026.rar

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for municipal waste bags is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a specified procedure type. The submission deadline, while short, is provided. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and potential issues with the deadline's reasonableness (given the short notice) slightly lower the score.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is provided. The existence of a specific form template (SWZ) suggests structured requirements. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. The tender documents are available. However, crucial details such as the estimated value, contract duration, and specific evaluation criteria are missing, significantly impacting the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The CPV code is standard. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, potentially disadvantaging bidders who cannot gauge the scale of the contract or the basis for selection. The short deadline also raises concerns about equal opportunity.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the 'Issues' section explicitly states 'No e-submission', creating a contradiction. The lack of disclosed contract duration and financing information further reduces practicality for bidders.

No e-submission (contradicts 'E-Procurement' characteristic)
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates are logical within the context of an active tender. The primary inconsistency lies in the 'E-Procurement' characteristic versus the 'No e-submission' issue.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' issue
Sustainability50/100

The tender focuses solely on the supply of plastic bags and does not mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability in the procurement process.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
CPV code provided
Documents available
E-Procurement characteristic (though contradicted)
Reference number and organization specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations
Contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Specify the estimated contract value and duration.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure consistency regarding the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline