Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping of the building at Latgales Street 189, Riga

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
160527
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Technical ProposalTechnical
Financial ProposalPrice
Technical Team Qualifications and ExperienceExperience
Relevant ExperienceExperience
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping of the building at Latgales Street 189, Riga
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong technical proposal demonstrating clear understanding of the 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija' and a competitive financial offer will be paramount. Emphasis on efficient project delivery and adherence to all mandatory requirements is key.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and efficient execution of renovation, reconstruction, and landscaping works at Latgales iela 189, Riga, delivered on time and within budget.

Demonstrated expertise and technical capability in complex urban building and site development projects.

Key Opportunities
The absence of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value through a superior technical proposal and a highly competitive price.
The short 6-month duration suggests a need for efficient project management and a well-resourced team, which can be highlighted as a strength.
The focus on renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping allows for showcasing specialized skills in these areas.
Key Challenges
The lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid to the contracting authority's priorities.

Focus on fulfilling all stated requirements meticulously and present a technically sound and cost-effective solution that implicitly addresses common procurement goals like quality, timeliness, and value for money.

Potential for a highly competitive bid due to the open tender format and lack of specific differentiators mentioned.

Ensure a highly competitive price while maintaining quality, and clearly articulate the bidder's strengths in the technical proposal, even if not explicitly requested as a differentiator.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in building renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping, particularly in urban environments. The ideal bidder will have a robust technical team, a clear understanding of Latvian procurement law, and the capacity to deliver the project within the 6-month timeframe. Financial stability and a competitive pricing strategy are also essential.
Key Requirements
Adherence to mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the Public Procurement Law.
Possession of all necessary licenses and permits to perform the works specified.
Demonstration of relevant experience in similar renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping projects.
Submission of a technical proposal adhering to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and aligning with 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija'.
Submission of a financial proposal in accordance with 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
Submission by the deadline of 2026-04-10T10:00:00.
Key Discriminators
A highly detailed and practical technical proposal that goes beyond the minimum requirements, demonstrating a deep understanding of the project's complexities and offering innovative (even if not explicitly requested) solutions for efficiency or quality.
A competitive and transparent financial proposal that clearly justifies costs and offers excellent value for money.
Proven track record of successful completion of similar projects within tight deadlines, backed by strong references.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider incorporating a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the technical proposal as a value-add, demonstrating corporate responsibility without violating tender terms.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Proposal

Develop a comprehensive technical proposal that meticulously addresses all aspects of 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija'. Emphasize methodology, timeline, resource allocation, and quality control. Showcase relevant experience with specific examples and highlight the qualifications of the technical team.

Financial Proposal

Ensure the financial proposal is competitive, transparent, and fully compliant with 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'. Conduct thorough cost analysis to offer the best possible value for money without compromising quality or profitability.

Compliance and Documentation

Scrupulously review and adhere to all submission requirements outlined in 'Atklāta konkursa nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'. Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed and all eligibility and technical capability requirements are met with robust documentation.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly analyze 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija'
CriticalHigh effort

Deeply understand all technical specifications, drawings, and the cost estimate. Ensure the technical proposal directly addresses every aspect of this document, demonstrating a clear plan for execution.

Ensures compliance and builds confidence in the bidder's capability.
Develop a robust and detailed technical proposal
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, the technical proposal becomes the primary means of demonstrating value. Outline a clear methodology, realistic timeline, resource allocation, and quality assurance plan. Highlight the experience of the project team.

Maximizes perceived value and technical competence.
Ensure flawless submission compliance
CriticalMed effort

Carefully review 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Atklāta konkursa nolikums' for all documentation and formatting requirements. Submit well before the deadline to avoid last-minute issues.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative errors.
Highlight project management efficiency for the 6-month duration
HighMed effort

Emphasize the bidder's ability to manage projects of this scope within a strict 6-month timeframe, showcasing strong planning, resource management, and risk mitigation strategies.

Addresses a key project constraint and demonstrates capability.
Proactively address potential ambiguities in technical specifications
HighLow effort

If any part of 'Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācija' is unclear, consider submitting a formal clarification request to the contracting authority to ensure a precise understanding and avoid costly errors.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and rework.
Demonstrate relevant experience with specific examples
MediumMed effort

When detailing experience, provide concrete examples of similar renovation, reconstruction, and landscaping projects, including scale, complexity, and outcomes. Quantify achievements where possible.

Builds credibility and trust.
Consider voluntary social value commitments
LowLow effort

Although not mandated, consider including a brief statement on potential local employment or waste reduction initiatives in the technical proposal as a subtle differentiator, demonstrating a forward-thinking approach.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, impression.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most technically sound and cost-effective solution, emphasizing reliability and efficiency in project delivery. Highlight the bidder's proven ability to execute similar projects successfully within tight deadlines, making them the low-risk, high-value choice.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-10T10:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in accordance with the regulations for an open tender as detailed in "Atklāta konkursa nolikums".
--Bids must include all required documentation as specified in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the Public Procurement Law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered entities authorized to conduct business in their country of origin.
--Bidders must possess all necessary licenses and permits to perform the works specified in the tender.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must demonstrate relevant experience in similar renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping projects.
--Bidders must provide details of their technical team, including qualifications and experience.
--Bidders must submit a technical proposal outlining their approach to the project, including methodology, timeline, and resource allocation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must provide a financial proposal detailing the costs associated with the project.
--The financial proposal must be submitted in accordance with the specifics outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
160527_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260311051410.pdf -- 100.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting bids, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical proposal details, financial proposal specifics, and evaluation methods for the renovation and landscaping of buildings at Latgales iela 189, Riga.

Atklāta konkursa nolikumsDOC
Līguma_projekts_2026_ēka_Latgales_189_atjauno... -- 225.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender concerning the renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping of a building on Latgales Street in Riga, including contract details, execution terms, and bidder obligations.

Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācijaXLS
Pielikums Nr.1.2._apjomi_Latgales_189_.xlsx -- 369.9 KB

This document contains the technical specification and cost estimate for the renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping of a building at Latgales iela 189, Riga.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender RDĪD 2025/89, which involves the renovation, simplified reconstruction, and landscaping of buildings at Latgales iela 189, Riga, with a submission deadline of April 10, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for building renovation and landscaping in Riga is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information, but specific legal challenges or disputes are not mentioned. The presence of mandatory exclusion grounds is noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is clear, and the requirements are documented across several attached files. The criteria for technical and financial proposals are specified, and conditions for contract execution are referenced. However, explicit evaluation criteria for bid selection are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and tender validity. Four documents are attached, covering the tender notice, regulations, requirements, and technical specification. The estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Document access is stated as restricted, which is a concern. While objective criteria for technical capability are implied through the technical proposal requirements, explicit evaluation criteria are absent. The value is not disclosed, hindering full transparency.

Restricted document access
Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

E-submission is indicated through the e-procurement characteristic. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The contract duration of 6 months is specified.

No explicit contract start date
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical, with reveal, submission, and opening dates appropriately sequenced. Tender validity aligns with the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Well-defined technical requirements
Open procedure and e-procurement
Reasonable timeline and contract duration

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid selection.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline