Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

MI bāzēts zīmolu un etiķešu dizainera rīks privātā zīmola nagu laku ražošanas platformai

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
December 30, 2025
CPV Code
Not disclosed
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 30, 2025

Deadline for Questions

January 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 16, 2026

Tender Opening

January 16, 2026

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
10 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
49
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

MI bāzēts zīmolu un etiķešu dizainera rīks privātā zīmola nagu laku ražošanas platformai

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-01-16 17:00:00.
--The bid must propose services for developing an AI-based brand and label designer tool.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are provided in the available tender information. Bidders are advised to comply with general procurement regulations regarding exclusion grounds applicable in Latvia.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are provided in the available tender information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to develop an AI-based (MI bāzēts) tool for brand and label design.
--The developed tool must be suitable for a private label nail polish manufacturing platform.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are provided in the available tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
49
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender is critically deficient, lacking fundamental documentation, clear procedures, and essential requirements, making it highly non-compliant with public procurement principles and impractical for fair competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance66/100

The tender exhibits severe non-compliance with basic public procurement principles. The absence of a specified procedure, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility criteria, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria, coupled with no accessible documents, renders the process opaque and legally questionable for a public tender.

•No specified procurement procedure
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Clarity40/100

While the core service description is clear, the overall tender documentation is extremely vague. Critical details regarding the scope of work, technical specifications of the AI tool, integration requirements, and the procurement process itself are entirely absent.

•Lack of detailed technical specifications
•Absence of clear procurement process steps
Completeness66/100

The tender is severely incomplete, missing almost all critical information required for a competitive bidding process. Key omissions include estimated value, CPV codes, detailed requirements, and all supporting tender documents.

•Estimated value not disclosed
•Missing CPV code
Fairness20/100

The complete absence of evaluation criteria, detailed requirements, and accessible tender documents creates an environment highly susceptible to unfair competition and subjective decision-making. This significantly undermines the principle of equal treatment among bidders and suggests potential tailoring for a specific company.

•Absence of evaluation criteria
•Potential for subjective selection
Practicality40/100

It is highly impractical for any potential bidder to prepare a meaningful, comprehensive, or competitive offer. Without detailed specifications, terms of reference, or an estimated value, bidders cannot accurately assess the scope, resources, or pricing.

•Inability to prepare a comprehensive bid without documents
•Difficulty in estimating project scope and cost
Data Consistency83/100

The limited data provided is internally consistent. However, the primary issue is the profound lack of data and documentation, rather than inconsistencies within the available information.

Sustainability0/100

No information or requirements related to environmental, social, or governance aspects are included in the tender, making it impossible to assess any sustainability considerations.

•No sustainability criteria specified

Strengths

Clear title and description of the core service
Reference number provided
Organization specified
Contract duration specified
Basic technical capability requirements outlined

Concerns

Extreme lack of documentation and restricted access, making bid preparation impossible
Absence of fundamental procurement elements (e.g., estimated value, procedure, evaluation criteria, eligibility)
High risk of unfair competition and tailoring due to lack of transparency and detailed requirements
Non-compliance with basic public procurement principles of transparency and equal treatment
Impracticality for bidders to submit a meaningful offer

Recommendations

1. Withdraw and re-issue the tender with complete and accessible documentation, including detailed specifications and terms of reference.
2. Clearly define the procurement procedure, comprehensive eligibility, exclusion, financial, and technical requirements, and explicit evaluation criteria.
3. Disclose the estimated value and assign appropriate CPV codes to enhance transparency and market reach.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes