Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Study “Implementation of nationally sociologically representative surveys for the needs of youth policy and youth work monitoring (2026)”

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
166042
Value
€32,000
Location
Latvia
Published
February 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€32,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
73210000 — Research consultancy services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€32,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
74
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€45,411
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
1,077 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Study “Implementation of nationally sociologically representative surveys for the needs of youth policy and youth work monitoring (2026)”

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on national-level sociological surveys for youth policy monitoring. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the modest budget, a winning strategy will emphasize demonstrable methodological rigor, cost-effectiveness, and a clear understanding of the Latvian youth landscape. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority to clarify requirements is crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering robust, representative data for informed youth policy decisions.

Cost-effective and efficient survey execution tailored to the Latvian context.

Expertise in youth research and policy monitoring.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value through the bid.
The modest budget (32,000.0 EUR) suggests a need for lean and efficient operations, favoring experienced, cost-conscious bidders.
The focus on 'youth policy and youth work monitoring' allows for specialization and demonstration of deep domain knowledge.
Absence of explicit 'Green Procurement' or 'Social Aspects' requirements means these can be secondary differentiators if integrated efficiently, rather than mandatory burdens.
Key Challenges
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring.

Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority regarding their priorities and how they will assess bids. Assume a focus on technical merit, cost, and understanding of the subject matter. Structure the bid to clearly articulate value across these presumed areas.

The limited budget may constrain the scope or depth of methodologies, requiring careful resource allocation.

Develop a lean but methodologically sound approach. Prioritize cost-effective sampling and data collection methods that still ensure representativeness. Clearly justify any methodological choices based on budget constraints and project objectives.

Potential for high competition due to the straightforward nature of the service and the lack of complex prerequisites.

Focus on clear, concise language and a well-structured proposal. Highlight unique expertise in Latvian youth research and demonstrate a clear understanding of the Ministry's objectives. Emphasize efficiency and value for money.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A Latvian-based research institute or consultancy with a proven track record in conducting large-scale, representative sociological surveys, particularly those involving youth demographics. The ideal bidder will possess strong data analysis capabilities, a deep understanding of Latvian social structures and youth issues, and a cost-efficient operational model.
Key Requirements
Demonstrate capability to conduct national-level, sociologically representative surveys.
Understand and address the needs of youth policy and youth work monitoring.
Adhere to the submission deadline of 2026-03-06 10:00:00.
Provide a cost-effective solution within the estimated value of 32,000.0 EUR.
Deliver the project within the 7-month duration.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated expertise in Latvian youth sociology and policy landscape.
Innovative yet cost-effective sampling and data collection methodologies.
Strong track record of delivering high-quality, representative national surveys within budget and timeline.
A clear, actionable plan for translating survey findings into policy-relevant insights for the Ministry.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider incorporating a commitment to ethical data handling and anonymization, and potentially a plan for sharing anonymized, aggregated findings with youth organizations or educational institutions to foster broader engagement with the research outcomes.
Bid Focus Areas
Methodology and Representativeness

Detail a robust sampling strategy that ensures national representativeness across key demographic groups relevant to youth. Clearly explain data collection methods (e.g., online, phone, in-person) and how they will achieve the required coverage and response rates, justifying choices based on cost-effectiveness and feasibility within the Latvian context.

Understanding of Youth Policy and Work

Demonstrate a deep understanding of current Latvian youth policies, challenges, and the landscape of youth work. Frame the survey's objectives and proposed questions in a way that directly addresses the monitoring needs of the Ministry, showing how the research will provide actionable insights.

Cost-Effectiveness and Value for Money

Present a detailed and transparent budget that clearly aligns with the estimated value. Highlight efficiencies in your operational model, team structure, and technology use to demonstrate how you can deliver high-quality results within the budget. Offer clear deliverables and value-added components.

Project Management and Timeline

Provide a realistic and detailed project plan with clear milestones, timelines, and responsibilities. Emphasize your ability to manage the project efficiently to ensure completion within the 7-month duration, including clear communication protocols with the contracting authority.

Recommendations6
Clarify Evaluation Criteria and Ministry Priorities
CriticalMed effort

Proactively contact the contracting authority (Izglītības un zinātnes ministrija) to request clarification on how bids will be evaluated. Understand their key priorities for this research beyond the stated description.

Allows for precise tailoring of the bid to maximize scoring potential and address implicit requirements.
Develop a Robust, Cost-Effective Methodology
CriticalHigh effort

Design a sampling and data collection methodology that guarantees national representativeness while remaining cost-efficient. Justify all methodological choices, highlighting how they balance scientific rigor with budget constraints.

Addresses the core technical requirement and the implicit need for value for money.
Showcase Deep Understanding of Latvian Youth Context
HighMed effort

Incorporate evidence of your team's expertise in Latvian youth sociology, policy, and the youth work sector. This can be through CVs of key personnel, references to previous relevant projects, or a detailed narrative in the proposal.

Positions the bidder as a subject matter expert, not just a survey provider.
Prepare a Detailed and Transparent Budget
HighMed effort

Break down all costs clearly, demonstrating efficiency and value. Ensure the total bid price is competitive and aligns with the estimated value.

Crucial for demonstrating financial viability and competitive pricing.
Develop a Realistic Project Plan
MediumMed effort

Create a detailed project schedule with clear milestones, deliverables, and resource allocation to ensure timely completion within the 7-month timeframe.

Mitigates the risk of delays and demonstrates strong project management capabilities.
Integrate Ethical Data Practices
LowLow effort

While not a mandatory requirement, explicitly mention your commitment to ethical data handling, anonymization, and data security in your proposal.

Enhances credibility and aligns with general public sector expectations, even if not explicitly scored.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the best combination of methodological soundness, deep local expertise in youth research, and demonstrable value for money. Emphasize efficiency and a clear understanding of the Ministry's monitoring objectives. Highlight the team's specific experience with Latvian youth demographics and policy frameworks.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--No specific submission requirements were provided in the analyzed information.
--Bids must be submitted by 2026-03-06T10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were provided in the analyzed information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements were provided in the analyzed information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements were provided in the analyzed information.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements were provided in the analyzed information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166042_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260218120958.pdf -- 100.4 KB

Summary generation failed

NolikumsZIP
Nolikums_5.zip -- 325.8 KB

Summary generation failed

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

74
Good

Tender Quality Score

Automated quality analysis based on rule-based checks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Clarity60/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Completeness100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Fairness60/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Practicality40/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Data Consistency100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Sustainability0/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Strengths

No specific strengths identified

Concerns

No specific concerns identified

Recommendations

No specific recommendations

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes