Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Service and Maintenance of Kitchen Equipment

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027998-2026
Value
£990,000
Location
West Wales and The Valleys, United Kingdom
Published
April 09, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Budget
£990,000
Duration
36 months
Location
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Service and Maintenance of Kitchen Equipment for RCT CBC and Merthyr CBC.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
027998-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
027998-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
027998-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for kitchen equipment services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the basic requirements are listed. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation makes it difficult to fully understand the precise expectations for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content significantly hinders completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although specific evaluation criteria are missing. The lack of e-submission is a minor drawback.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of explicit e-submission and financing information reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Specified organization and estimated value
Open procedure for broad participation
Logical timeline and contract details

Concerns

Missing detailed tender documents with content
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Lack of e-submission functionality
No explicit sustainability or innovation considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed tender documents with clear content and summaries.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Consider incorporating e-submission options and highlighting sustainability aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline