Skip to main content
Tenders

Fuel purchase

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
169070
Value
€35,000
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
lowest price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€35,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€688,479
Avg. Bids
2.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
498 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Fuel purchase

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--[Submission documents are specified in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija']
--[Submission procedures are specified in 'Nolikums']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Exclusion conditions are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Not explicitly detailed, but implied by the need to submit proposals and meet technical/financial criteria]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Technical proposal requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Financial proposal requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169070_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324163049.pdf -- 102.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender to procure fuel for the Latgale Industrial Technical School, specifying submission documents, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria based on the lowest price.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169070_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260324163050.pdf -- 102.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the second part of a tender, specifically for the procurement of fuel for Latgales Industriālais tehnikums's educational programs in Dagda.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169070_PD.ANY_1_1_3_20260324163050.pdf -- 102.0 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for the procurement of fuel for Latgales Industriālais tehnikums, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria based on the lowest price.

NolikumsDOC
Degviela_Nolikums.doc -- 426.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for a tender process for the purchase of fuel, specifying requirements, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender for the purchase of fuel, including identification number, status, deadlines, and contracting authority details.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for fuel procurement is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed unless otherwise indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise. While requirements are referenced in attached documents, the explicit detailing of evaluation criteria within the main notice is missing, which could impact clarity for potential bidders.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria in main notice
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the accessibility of all required documents is a concern, potentially impacting the completeness of information available to all bidders.

Restricted document access
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although the explicit mention of evaluation criteria is lacking. The primary concern is restricted document access, which could limit fair competition.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the specific mention of 'No e-submission' in the checks suggests a potential contradiction or a lack of clarity on the submission method. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit sustainability criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and structure
E-Procurement enabled
Reasonable timeline and disclosed value
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and open access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly state evaluation criteria within the main tender notice.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline