Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Expansion of existing LAN network infrastructure

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00173191/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warszawski stołeczny, Poland
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warszawski stołeczny
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€662,690
Avg. Bids
0.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
4,174 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Expansion of existing LAN network infrastructure

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for LAN network infrastructure expansion by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (Urząd Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego) presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, strict adherence to mandatory requirements, and a clear understanding of the client's operational needs, even without explicit evaluation criteria.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Secure Network Expansion for a Critical Financial Institution

Proven Technical Expertise and Seamless Integration

Commitment to Operational Continuity and Future Scalability

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria implies a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and demonstrating basic competence. Bidders who exceed these basic expectations will stand out.
The CPV code (32424000-1) indicates a standard network infrastructure delivery, allowing bidders to leverage existing expertise and solutions.
The contracting authority is a significant public body (Urząd Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego), suggesting a need for high levels of security, reliability, and compliance.
Key Challenges
The absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring. Bidders must assume a 'pass/fail' or 'best value' approach where exceeding minimums is key.

Focus on comprehensively addressing all stated requirements, providing detailed evidence of capability, and highlighting any unique strengths or value-adds that go beyond the minimum expectations, even if not explicitly scored.

The tender is for 'Dostawy' (Supplies), which might imply a focus on hardware and standard installation rather than complex design or consulting. Bidders need to align their offering accordingly.

Ensure the bid clearly outlines the supply chain, product quality, warranty, and delivery logistics for network equipment. Highlight expertise in managing large-scale hardware deployments.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A mid-to-large sized IT infrastructure provider with a proven track record in delivering complex network solutions for public sector or financial institutions in Poland. The ideal bidder possesses strong technical expertise in LAN technologies, a robust supply chain for network hardware, and a dedicated team experienced in navigating Polish public procurement processes.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds Compliance
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with similar financial sector clients or critical infrastructure projects.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential network expansion challenges specific to an existing, operational environment.
A robust and detailed project management plan that emphasizes minimal disruption to the client's current operations.
Strong warranty and post-implementation support offerings.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, a bidder could proactively offer a commitment to employing local, skilled IT professionals for the installation and maintenance phases, contributing to local employment and economic development within the PL911 region.
Bid Focus Areas
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds

Ensure absolute compliance. Thoroughly review all declarations and provide all necessary supporting documentation. Any non-compliance here is an automatic disqualification.

Eligibility Requirements

Provide clear and verifiable proof of legal status, financial standing, and any required certifications. Document all third-party contributions meticulously.

Technical Capability

Detail past projects of similar scale and complexity, focusing on network infrastructure. Provide CVs of key personnel and highlight relevant certifications. Clearly outline the proposed solution's technical specifications and compatibility with existing infrastructure.

Financial Requirements

Present clear financial statements and evidence of economic capacity. If relying on third parties, ensure their financial stability is also well-documented.

Submission Requirements

Adhere strictly to formatting, content, and submission deadlines. Double-check all documents for completeness and accuracy. Utilize the provided templates and follow all instructions precisely.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Address All Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'Załączniki do SWZ.docx' for all declarations and commitments. Ensure no grounds for exclusion are met by the bidder or any subcontractors. This is a non-negotiable prerequisite for participation.

Prevents automatic disqualification.
Assume a 'Best Value' or 'Exceeding Minimums' Approach
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, focus on demonstrating superior technical capability, robust project management, and a clear understanding of the client's operational context (financial institution). Highlight any added value beyond basic requirements.

Increases perceived value and competitiveness.
Emphasize Experience with Critical Infrastructure and Financial Sector
HighMed effort

Showcase past projects involving high-security, high-availability network deployments, particularly for government or financial entities. Provide case studies or references that highlight successful delivery under stringent conditions.

Builds trust and demonstrates relevant expertise.
Develop a Detailed Technical Solution and Implementation Plan
CriticalHigh effort

Outline the proposed network expansion solution with specific hardware/software details, ensuring compatibility with the existing infrastructure. Include a phased implementation plan that minimizes disruption to the Urząd Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego's operations.

Demonstrates technical competence and operational awareness.
Proactive Risk Assessment and Mitigation for Existing Infrastructure
MediumMed effort

Identify potential risks associated with expanding an existing network (e.g., compatibility issues, downtime, security vulnerabilities). Present a clear plan to mitigate these risks, demonstrating foresight and preparedness.

Reduces client perceived risk.
Commitment to Local Employment and Skill Development
LowLow effort

Even though social aspects are not explicitly required, include a statement about utilizing local skilled IT personnel for installation and support, contributing to the regional economy and demonstrating corporate social responsibility.

Positive perception, potential differentiator.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and technically sound choice for a critical financial institution. Highlight a deep understanding of the regulatory environment and the need for robust, secure, and scalable network solutions. Emphasize a proactive approach to project management and risk mitigation, ensuring minimal disruption and maximum operational continuity for the Urząd Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b2b-bb82-3c4f-5fad-950001e7119d.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the expansion of the existing LAN network infrastructure by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority.

Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdfPDF
Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice from the Polish Financial Supervision Authority for the expansion of existing LAN network infrastructure.

SWZ www_24.03.pdfPDF
SWZ www_24.03.pdf

This document contains the Terms of Reference (SWZ) for a public procurement procedure concerning the expansion of the existing LAN network infrastructure by the Office of the Financial Supervision Authority.

Załączniki do SWZ.docxDOC
Załączniki do SWZ.docx

This document contains declarations and commitments required from bidders and any third parties whose resources are being relied upon, to confirm their eligibility and compliance with exclusion grounds and participation conditions for the "Expansion of existing LAN network infrastructure" tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for LAN infrastructure expansion is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and financial details, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear CPV code and location. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and potential for a short submission deadline (depending on local regulations for this type of tender) are minor concerns.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the provided documents (SWZ, tender notice) offer substantial information about the scope and requirements. The AI-extracted requirements list is also helpful.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, CPV, and location. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the documents are accessible. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are listed, suggesting an objective approach. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the AI-extracted information indicates 'No e-submission' which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating ambiguity. The contract start date and financing information are also missing.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information, indicating a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined CPV code and location
Accessible tender documents with summaries
E-Procurement characteristic indicated

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline