Tenders

Arboricultural advice for 3 years

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
008913-2026
Value
£108,000
Location
East of England, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£108,000
Duration
37 months
Location
East of England
Type
Other
44
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

The Broads Authority is seeking a suitably qualified and experienced contractor to supply Arboricultural advice, primarily to the Planning department. Work will include: • Dealing with tree works applications for protected trees • Advising the Development Management team on tree-related matters arising as a result of planning applications • To undertake duties relating to the making of new Tree Preservation Orders Along with other works detailed in the tender pack.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-16T14:00:00+00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The contractor must be suitably qualified.
--The contractor must be experienced.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Ability to supply arboricultural advice.
--Capability to deal with tree works applications for protected trees.
--Ability to advise the Development Management team on tree-related matters arising as a result of planning applications.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements for bidders (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance levels) are detailed in the provided information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

Download failed - no summary available

OCDS RecordDOC
008913-2026_ocds_record.json

The Broads Authority is seeking a qualified and experienced contractor to provide arboricultural advice and services, including managing tree works applications, advising on planning matters, and creating Tree Preservation Orders.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
008913-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Broads Authority's open tender for suitably qualified contractors to supply arboricultural advice, primarily to its Planning department.

Official PDF VersionPDF
008913-2026_official.pdf

The Broads Authority seeks an experienced contractor for a 3-year arboricultural advice contract, primarily for its Planning department, covering tree works applications, planning advice, and Tree Preservation Orders, with an estimated value of £90,000.

Tender NoticeHTM
008913-2026.html

The Broads Authority seeks a qualified contractor to provide arboricultural advice for its Planning department for three years, covering tree works applications, planning advice, and Tree Preservation Orders, with an estimated value of £90,000.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

44
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender for arboricultural advice presents significant deficiencies, particularly in legal compliance, clarity, and fairness due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, evaluation criteria, and specific financial requirements. The inability to access a key document ("Lot L-1") further compromises the integrity and completeness of the process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance40/100

The tender critically lacks mandatory exclusion grounds and specified evaluation criteria, which are fundamental legal requirements for transparent procurement. The missing reveal date also hinders a full assessment of the minimum bidding period.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity50/100

While the service description is clear, the eligibility and technical requirements are vaguely defined (e.g., 'suitably qualified,' 'experienced') without specific metrics. The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue for potential bidders.

Vague eligibility and technical requirements
No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness40/100

A critical document, 'Lot L-1,' failed to download, which is a significant gap, especially as the tender is 'Divided into Parts.' Furthermore, mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.

Critical document 'Lot L-1' failed to download
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness35/100

The absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts fairness, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. The failed download of 'Lot L-1' creates an unequal playing field, and the lack of e-submission is a barrier to equal access.

No evaluation criteria specified
Critical document 'Lot L-1' failed to download
Practicality55/100

The lack of electronic submission support is a practical drawback in modern procurement. The failure to download a potentially crucial document ('Lot L-1') also presents a significant practical hurdle for interested parties.

No electronic submission supported
Critical document 'Lot L-1' failed to download
Data Consistency60/100

There is an inconsistency in the estimated value's currency/amount between the main data (108,000 EUR) and document summaries (£90,000). Several key fields, such as 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, are also empty, and the reveal date is missing.

Inconsistency in estimated value (EUR vs GBP in summaries)
Empty 'Liable Person' field and procedure codes
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus, indicating a complete lack of sustainability considerations.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects included

Strengths

Clear description of the required services
Basic tender information (title, reference, organization, CPV) is well-defined
Estimated value and contract duration are specified
Procedure type (Open, Below threshold) is clearly stated

Concerns

Critical: Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria
Critical: 'Lot L-1' document failed to download, potentially withholding crucial tender details
Lack of specific eligibility and financial requirements for bidders
No support for electronic submission
Inconsistency in the estimated value currency/amount between the main data and document summaries

Recommendations

1. Immediately rectify the missing mandatory exclusion grounds and publish clear, objective evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents, especially 'Lot L-1,' are accessible and downloadable.
3. Provide more specific eligibility and financial requirements to guide bidders effectively.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline