Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Finsley Gate 2 & 4 Car Parks, Burnley - Surfacing Improvements

Closed

Updated October 09, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018774-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
Lancashire, United Kingdom
Published
October 05, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
£60,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
45213312 — Car park building construction work
Procedure
Open procedure
Lots
Divided into lots
Budget
£60,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Lancashire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tenders are invited for the re-surfacing and re-configuration of Finsley Gate 2 & 4 Car Parks.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
018774-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
018774-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
018774-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for car park surfacing improvements is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is 'Below threshold - open competition', which is a standard approach for this value.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is concise and understandable. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed.

•Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, the crucial 'Tender Documents' section indicates 'Documents with content/summaries: 0', suggesting that the detailed tender documents are not readily accessible or summarized within the notice itself, which is a significant omission.

•No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although specific evaluation criteria are missing. The lack of explicit mention of e-procurement is a minor concern for modern standards.

Practicality65/100

The contract start and submission deadlines are provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission is a drawback, as is the absence of document content, which hinders practical assessment by potential bidders.

•No e-submission mentioned
•No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of sustainability considerations is a notable area for improvement.

•Not green procurement
•No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Disclosed estimated value and duration
Standard open competition procedure
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of sustainability considerations
No explicit mention of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
2. Provide accessible content or summaries for all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes