Legal Compliance100/100
Legal compliance is severely compromised by the complete absence of tender documents, which are fundamental to any procurement. The lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements further exacerbates this, potentially violating basic procurement principles.
•No tender documents provided
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Clarity40/100
While the tender's description clearly outlines the strategic vision and scope for immersive and simulation technologies in health and care education, the overall clarity for potential bidders is extremely poor due to the complete absence of any supporting documentation or detailed requirements. A sentence in the description is also repeated.
•Complete absence of detailed requirements and supporting documents
•Repeated sentence in the description
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any tender documents, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria means that essential information required for a compliant and fair procurement process is entirely missing.
•No tender documents provided
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Fairness80/100
The complete lack of tender documents, detailed requirements, and evaluation criteria creates a significant risk of unfairness and lack of transparency. Without this information, potential bidders cannot understand the basis for selection, making the process opaque and potentially arbitrary.
•Lack of transparency due to missing documents and evaluation criteria
•High risk of arbitrary selection due to insufficient information
Practicality40/100
From a bidder's perspective, it is impractical, if not impossible, to prepare a meaningful submission without any tender documents or detailed instructions. For the contracting authority, managing a procurement of this scale without fundamental documentation is highly impractical and exposes the process to significant risks.
•Impossible for bidders to prepare a compliant submission
•High operational risk for the contracting authority due to lack of documentation
Data Consistency100/100
The core requirements (eligibility, technical capability) align with the tender's description. However, a minor inconsistency is the repeated sentence within the description itself. The 'Restricted procedure' for a DPS, while potentially referring to the initial qualification, could be clearer given the open nature of DPS.
•Repeated sentence in the description
Sustainability0/100
The tender lacks any explicit mention or integration of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. For a national agreement of this magnitude, this represents a missed opportunity to drive broader public value and align with modern procurement best practices.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria