Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Swimming pool and gym rental, Phase 1

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
169188
Value
€27,686
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Technical specification and offerTechnical
Financial offerPrice
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€27,686
Duration
4 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€14,392
Avg. Bids
1.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
948 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Swimming pool and gym rental, Phase 1

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for swimming pool and sports hall rental presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating clear technical capability, competitive pricing within the estimated value, and a thorough understanding of the contract terms. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, subtle enhancements can create differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Compliant Facility Provision for RSU Sports.

Cost-Effective and Transparent Rental Solution.

Key Opportunities
The absence of specified evaluation criteria allows for a focus on meeting all mandatory requirements and presenting a clear, compliant bid.
The relatively short duration (4 months) and capped contract value suggest a need for a straightforward, efficient offering rather than complex, long-term solutions.
The CPV code 92610000 (Sports facilities management services) indicates a focus on operational aspects of sports facilities.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to prioritize bid elements for maximum scoring.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas, particularly technical capability and financial offer clarity, to implicitly demonstrate superior value.

The estimated value and short duration might attract bidders focused solely on price, potentially leading to a race to the bottom.

Emphasize reliability, quality of service, and a clear understanding of RSU's needs to justify a competitive, but not necessarily the lowest, price.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established provider of sports and recreational facilities with a proven track record of managing similar venues. The ideal bidder will possess a swimming pool and sports hall that meets RSU's needs, demonstrate financial stability, and have a clear understanding of contractual obligations and pricing structures.
Key Requirements
Technical specification and offer for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall, including services for RSU sports teams.
Inclusion of all costs except VAT in the financial offer.
Adherence to the terms, conditions, and payment procedures outlined in the draft contract (5.pielikums_līguma projekts).
Confirmation of eligibility and understanding of tender terms.
Submission of a declaration confirming independent development of the tender.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a proactive understanding of RSU's sports team needs beyond the basic requirement, perhaps by offering flexible scheduling or minor support services.
Presenting a meticulously organized bid that clearly addresses every requirement with specific evidence and avoids any ambiguity.
Offering a slightly more detailed technical specification that highlights the quality and suitability of the facilities for sports training and competition.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement about commitment to accessible sporting opportunities or local employment if applicable to the bidder's operations, framed as a general company ethos rather than a specific tender commitment.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Rental of Swimming Pool and Sports Hall, Services for RSU Sports Teams)

Provide a detailed, clear, and compelling technical specification that directly addresses the needs of RSU sports teams. Highlight the suitability of the facilities for various sports and any unique features. Include evidence of past successful provision of similar services.

Financial Offer (All costs except VAT)

Ensure the financial offer is comprehensive, transparent, and competitive within the estimated value. Clearly itemize all costs and ensure no hidden charges. Double-check calculations to avoid errors.

Compliance and Documentation

Meticulously review all submission requirements and tender documents. Ensure all forms are completed accurately and all required declarations are submitted. Pay close attention to the draft contract (5.pielikums_līguma projekts) and confirm full adherence.

Recommendations5
Thoroughly Analyze Draft Contract
CriticalMed effort

Scrutinize '5.pielikums_līguma projekts' to fully understand all terms, conditions, and payment procedures. Ensure your bid and operational plan align perfectly with these contractual obligations.

Prevents future disputes and ensures compliance, increasing the likelihood of a successful award and contract execution.
Focus on Clarity and Completeness in Technical Offer
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a strong emphasis on technical capability. Provide a detailed, well-structured technical specification that clearly outlines the swimming pool and sports hall's features, capacity, and suitability for RSU sports teams. Include any relevant certifications or accreditations.

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirement and the ability to deliver high-quality services, making the bid more attractive.
Proactive Service Offering for Sports Teams
MediumLow effort

Go beyond the basic requirement of providing services for RSU sports teams. Consider offering minor value-adds, such as flexible scheduling options, basic equipment availability, or a dedicated point of contact for the sports teams, and highlight these in the technical offer.

Sets the bid apart from competitors by demonstrating a commitment to supporting RSU's athletic endeavors.
Meticulous Financial Offer Preparation
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all costs except VAT are included and clearly itemized in the financial offer form. Conduct a thorough review to prevent any omissions or errors that could lead to disqualification or financial loss.

Ensures compliance with financial requirements and prevents potential financial risks.
Confirm Independent Bid Development
HighLow effort

Submit the required declaration confirming independent development of the tender. Ensure all internal processes and documentation support this claim to avoid any potential issues related to anti-competitive practices.

Mitigates a mandatory exclusion ground, ensuring the bid is considered.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as a reliable, compliant, and cost-effective solution that directly addresses RSU's need for sports facility rental. Emphasize operational excellence and a clear understanding of the contractual framework, rather than focusing on innovation or extensive social value commitments which are not prioritized in this tender.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidder must submit a declaration confirming independent development of their tender.
--Bidder must submit an application form.
--Bidder must submit a financial offer form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidder must not have engaged in anti-competitive communication with other bidders.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidder must confirm their eligibility.
--Bidder must confirm understanding of tender terms.
--Bidder must provide company details.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidder must provide a technical specification and offer for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall.
--Bidder must be able to provide services for RSU sports teams.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidder must include all costs except VAT in their financial offer.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169188_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260326153945.pdf -- 95.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

NolikumsDOC
65_AP_Nolikums_Sporta_zale_ noma.docx -- 64.8 KB

This document contains the regulations for a tender process initiated by Rīga Stradiņš University for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall.

1.pielikums_pieteikumsDOC
65_AP_Pielikums_1_Pieteikums.docx -- 25.0 KB

This document is an application form for a tender concerning the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall, requiring bidders to confirm their eligibility, understanding of the tender terms, and provide company details.

2.pielikums_ Tehniskā specifikācija/piedāvājumsDOC
65_AP_Pielikums_2_TS_Tehn_piedavajums_2603.do... -- 23.4 KB

This document contains the technical specification and offer for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall for RSU sports teams.

3.pielikums_apliecinājums neatkarīgi izstrādātam piedāvājumamDOC
65_AP_Pielikums_3_Neatkarigs_piedavajums.docx -- 21.1 KB

This document is a bidder's declaration confirming that their tender for the swimming pool and gym rental has been independently developed and that they have not engaged in any anti-competitive communication with other bidders.

4.pielikums_finanšu piedāvājumsDOC
65_AP_Pielikums_4_Finansu_piedavajums.docx -- 23.0 KB

This document is a financial offer form for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall, requiring the bidder to include all costs except VAT.

5.pielikums_līguma projektsDOC
65_AP_Pielikums_5_Liguma_projekts.docx -- 41.1 KB

This document contains the draft contract for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall, outlining the terms, conditions, and payment procedures between Rīga Stradiņš University and the lessor.

6.pielikums_apakšuzņēmēju sarakstsDOC
65_AP_Pielikums_6_Apaksuznemeju_saraksts.docx -- 17.5 KB

This document is a list of subcontractors that the bidder plans to engage for the execution of the contract for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall.

7.pielikums_apakšuzņēju apliecinājumsDOC
65_AP_Pielikums_7_Apaksuznemeju_apliecinajums... -- 18.4 KB

This document is a subcontractor's confirmation form for a tender, where a subcontractor or a third party whose capabilities the bidder relies on confirms their involvement and agreement to participate in the tender for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender RSU 2026/65/AP, which is for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the rental of a swimming pool and sports hall is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has some concerns regarding document access and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is open, which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached specifications and forms. The conditions for participation are outlined, although evaluation criteria are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. A comprehensive set of documents is attached, covering technical specifications, financial offers, and contract drafts. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria impacts overall completeness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. Requirements are generally objective, but the lack of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. A contract duration of 4 months is specified. However, specific financing information and a clear contract start date are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.

Financing information not explicitly detailed
Contract start date not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear procedure and open competition
Comprehensive set of required documents
Use of e-procurement
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access (implied by 'Issues' flag)
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline