Videonovērošanas kameru piegāde
ClosedKey facts
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 35125300 — Security cameras
- Procedure
- Open procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
14 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
4 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the comprehensive requirements for the tender 'Supply of video surveillance cameras' by the Road Traffic Safety Directorate. It details the exclusion and selection criteria, mandatory technical and financial proposal submissions (referencing specific annexes for forms/samples), and the tender evaluation method. Key requirements include demonstrating experience, submitting a technical proposal, and providing a financial proposal in EUR without VAT, with the lowest price being the sole evaluation criterion.
{
"ai_summary_en": "This document is Appendix 1, the Technical Specification, for the CSDD procurement of video surveillance cameras. It details the technical requirements for the cameras to be supplied. Bidders must ensure their offers, including this specification, are signed by their representative using a secure electronic signature with a timestamp or an EIS electronic signature.",
"ai_summary_et": "See dokument on CSDD videovalvekaamerate hankelepingu tehniline spetsifikatsioon (l
This document, Skaidrojums Nr.1, is a clarification issued by the procurement commission of the Road Traffic Safety Directorate (VAS “Ceļu satiksmes drošības direkcija”). It addresses a supplier's question regarding the regulations for the tender "Supply of video surveillance cameras" (Id.Nr. CSDD 2025/78). Bidders should carefully review this explanation to understand any amendments or interpretations of the original tender documents.
This document, titled "Explanation No. 2," is issued by the Road Traffic Safety Directorate for the "Supply of video surveillance cameras" tender (Id.Nr. CSDD 2025/78). It serves as an official clarification or addendum to the tender regulations, specifically addressing a question raised by a potential supplier. The procurement commission has reviewed the inquiry and provides explanations regarding the tender's terms and conditions.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender is critically deficient due to the complete absence of all essential procurement documents, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a compliant and informed offer. The lack of transparency regarding the tender's core requirements and evaluation criteria is a significant concern.
Score Breakdown
Legal compliance is severely compromised as fundamental tender documents, including technical specifications, selection criteria, exclusion grounds, and evaluation criteria, are not provided. This directly hinders transparency, equal treatment, and the ability for bidders to understand and meet legal requirements.
Clarity is extremely poor. While requirements are listed, they consistently refer to 'tender documents', 'Appendix 1', and 'clarifications' that are explicitly stated as unavailable. This creates significant ambiguity and makes it impossible to understand the actual scope and requirements.
The tender is critically incomplete. No tender documents, technical specifications, forms, or clarifications are attached or accessible. This renders the tender effectively unpublishable in its current state, as bidders have no information to base their proposals on.
Fairness is significantly undermined. Without access to the full tender documentation, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria, bidders cannot compete on an equal footing. The mention of 'clarifications (Skaidrojums Nr.1, Explanation No. 2)' without providing them is particularly unfair, as it suggests crucial information exists but is withheld.
From a bidder's perspective, the tender is entirely impractical. It is impossible to prepare a technical or financial proposal without the core documents, technical specifications, and an understanding of the evaluation criteria. The short contract duration of 1 month, while not a concern in itself, adds to the pressure if the scope were to be substantial.
There is a significant inconsistency between the 'EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section, which repeatedly references specific documents (e.g., 'Appendix 1', 'tender documents', 'clarifications'), and the 'DOCUMENTS' section, which explicitly states '0 total' and 'No document content available'.
No sustainability criteria or considerations are mentioned in the extracted requirements. The automated check also flags 'Not green procurement', indicating a missed opportunity to integrate environmental or social aspects.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required