Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of new passenger cars for SIA “Smiltenes NKUP”

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
164789
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
February 02, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offered price (without VAT)60%
Warranty term20%
Delivery term20%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 20, 2026

Tender Opening

February 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
34110000 — Passenger cars
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Supplies
64
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€168,348
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,060 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of new passenger cars for SIA “Smiltenes NKUP”

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not fall under the specified exclusion criteria detailed in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
164789_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260202145524.pdf -- 100.9 KB

This document contains the procurement requirements, exclusion and selection criteria, technical and financial offer requirements, and evaluation criteria for the acquisition of a new light vehicle for SIA “Smiltenes NKUP”.

Pieteikums, 1. pielikumsDOC
SNKUP IEP 01. pielikums jaunas automašīnas i... -- 26.1 KB

This document contains an application form for participation in a procurement for the acquisition of a new car, requiring the bidder to confirm compliance with tender requirements, the validity of their offer, and their company's status.

Tehniskā specifikācija/tehn. Piedāvājums, 2. pielikumsDOC
SNKUP IEP 02. pielikums TS - vieglais transpo... -- 38.1 KB

This document contains the technical specification and requirements for the purchase of a new light vehicle for SIA “Smiltenes NKUP”, outlining supplier responsibilities, minimum client demands, and serving as a template for the bidder's technical offer.

Finanšu piedāvājums, 3. pielikumsDOC
SNKUP IEP 03. pielikums-FP, jaunas automašīna... -- 20.5 KB

This document contains a financial offer for the procurement of a new car for SIA “Smiltenes NKUP”, where the bidder proposes a total sum and confirms understanding of the tender requirements and commitment to the contract.

Līguma projekts, 4. pielikumsDOC
SNKUP IEP 04. pielikums-Līguma projekts, jaun... -- 34.6 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the supply of a new car, detailing the subject of the contract, the contract sum and payment procedure, and the rights and obligations of both the buyer and the seller.

Informācija par apakšuzņēmējiem, 5. pielikumsDOC
SNKUP IEP 05. pielikums Apakšuzņēmēju sarakst... -- 20.2 KB

This document contains a list for bidders to provide information about subcontractors and their subcontractors involved in the procurement contract for the purchase of a new car.

Apakšuzņēmēju apliecinājums, 6. pielikumsDOC
SNKUP IEP 06. pielikums AU apņemšanās, jaunas... -- 20.0 KB

This document contains a subcontractor's affirmation form for participation in a tender for the acquisition of a new car, requiring details of both the bidder and the subcontractor, and a description of the subcontractor's scope of work.

NolikumsDOC
SNKUP_IEP nolikums jaunas automašīnas iegāde,... -- 41.3 KB

This document contains the procurement regulations for the acquisition of a new car for SIA “Smiltenes NKUP”, detailing the tender procedure, subject, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

64
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a new passenger car presents clear basic information and an open procedure, but its transparency and fairness are significantly hampered by restricted document access and an undisclosed estimated value.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good basic compliance with an open procedure, appropriate CPV code, and a reasonable submission timeline. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern regarding transparency and adherence to procurement regulations. The non-disclosure of the estimated value is also a minor compliance point.

•Restricted document access
•Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The tender's description is clear, and the documents, based on their summaries, appear well-structured and comprehensive. The conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria (flagged as missing versus mentioned in a document summary) introduces a degree of ambiguity, slightly reducing the overall clarity score.

•Potential ambiguity regarding evaluation criteria due to conflicting information
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, deadlines, and location, is present. A comprehensive set of documents is listed. However, the estimated value of the procurement is not disclosed, which is a notable omission impacting the tender's completeness.

•Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness50/100

Fairness is a significant concern due to 'Restricted document access,' which critically impedes equal opportunity and transparency. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency. Conflicting information regarding e-submission capabilities and the clarity of evaluation criteria also detract from the perception of a fully fair and accessible process.

•Restricted document access
•Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality60/100

The practicality is compromised by contradictory information regarding e-submission ('E-Procurement' characteristic versus 'No e-submission' flag) and the 'Restricted document access.' This suggests potential difficulties for bidders in accessing documents and submitting offers electronically, despite the stated e-procurement characteristic.

•Contradictory information on e-submission
•Restricted document access
Data Consistency60/100

Several inconsistencies are present, notably the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic and the automated check flagging 'No e-submission.' There is also conflicting information regarding the specification of evaluation criteria. The estimated value also remains undisclosed, contributing to data gaps.

•Contradictory information on e-submission
•Contradictory information on evaluation criteria
Sustainability20/100

The tender shows no explicit focus on sustainability, green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•No sustainability, social, or innovation criteria

Strengths

Clear title, organization, and description
Open procedure, promoting competition
Reasonable submission deadline (18 days)
Comprehensive set of tender documents listed with summaries
No disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Restricted document access, severely impacting transparency and fairness
Estimated value not disclosed
Contradictory information regarding e-submission
Contradictory information regarding evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders to uphold transparency and fairness.
2. Clearly disclose the estimated value of the procurement to provide better context for bidders and enhance transparency.
3. Clarify and ensure consistency regarding e-submission capabilities and the explicit detailing of evaluation criteria in the main tender notice or easily accessible documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes