Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of design documentation for the task: "Construction of a pedestrian-bicycle path along voivodeship road No. 530 in the section Dobre Miasto – Głotowo"

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00163515/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€496,142
Avg. Bids
0.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
25,840 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of design documentation for the task: "Construction of a pedestrian-bicycle path along voivodeship road No. 530 in the section Dobre Miasto – Głotowo"

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85d3-a253-ea4a-056e-e500011b89e9.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the design documentation for the construction of a pedestrian-bicycle path along provincial road No. 530 between Dobre Miasto and Głotowo.

ZaêÑcznik nr 1 do SWZ Formularz ofertowy v0.2.docxDOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 1 do SWZ Formularz ofertowy v0.2... -- 29.7 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 2a oswiadczenia-wykonawcy-wykonawcow-z-art-125-ust-1-ustawy-Pzp-pon...DOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 2a oswiadczenia-wykonawcy-wykona... -- 27.3 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 2b oswiadczenia-podmiotu-udostepniajacego-zasoby-z-art-125-ust-5-Pz...DOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 2b oswiadczenia-podmiotu-udostep... -- 24.5 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 3 do SWZ ZobowiÑzanie podmiotu.docxDOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 3 do SWZ ZobowiÑzanie podmiotu.d... -- 16.4 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 4 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie.docxDOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 4 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie.docx -- 14.5 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 5 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie grupa kapitaêowa.docxDOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 5 do SWZ Oÿwiadczenie grupa kapi... -- 31.7 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 6 do SWZ Wykaz usêug.docxDOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 6 do SWZ Wykaz usêug.docx -- 17.1 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 7 do SWZ Wykaz osób.docxDOC
ZaêÑcznik nr 7 do SWZ Wykaz osób.docx -- 36.4 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 8 do SWZ Projekt umowy.pdfPDF
ZaêÑcznik nr 8 do SWZ Projekt umowy.pdf -- 278.8 KB

No content extracted

ZaêÑcznik nr 9 do SWZ Opis przedmiotu zamówienia.pdfPDF
ZaêÑcznik nr 9 do SWZ Opis przedmiotu zamówie... -- 254.0 KB

No content extracted

Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia.pdfPDF
Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the development of design documentation for the construction of a pedestrian-bicycle path along provincial road No. 530 between Dobre Miasto and Głotowo, to be submitted electronically.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for design documentation is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and available documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the main objective is well-defined. The attached documents, particularly the 'Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia', provide a foundation for understanding the requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and CPV code. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted sections, suggesting potential gaps in the publicly available information or the extraction process.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency. While no specific company tailoring is evident, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and detailed requirements could indirectly favor bidders with prior knowledge or experience with the procuring entity.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate 'No e-submission' which is a contradiction. The contract start date is not specified. Financing information is absent. The short contract duration of 3 months for design documentation might be impractical depending on the complexity.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The main inconsistency lies in the 'Procurement Characteristics' indicating 'E-Procurement' while AI-extracted requirements suggest 'No e-submission'.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project title and objective
Proper CPV code provided
E-procurement indicated
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure consistency with procurement characteristics.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline