Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of wrestling mats for the needs of SIA “Daugavpils Olympic Centre”

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
164633
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
January 29, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 13, 2026

Tender Opening

February 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
37400000 — Sport goods and equipment
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Supplies
68
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€19,755
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,265 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of wrestling mats for the needs of SIA “Daugavpils Olympic Centre”

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-02-13T09:00:00.
--Bids must adhere to all specified submission conditions and procedures.
--The bid must include both a technical offer and a financial offer.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not meet any of the specified exclusion criteria detailed in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must meet the selection criteria outlined in the tender documents.
--Bidders must comply with the general bidder requirements specified in the tender regulations.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The offered wrestling mats must fully comply with the technical specifications detailed in the procurement requirements.
--The technical offer must clearly describe how the proposed wrestling mats meet all specified technical requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a financial offer in accordance with the tender's financial offer specifications.
--The financial offer will be evaluated based on the lowest price.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
164633_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260129150220.pdf -- 95.7 KB

This document outlines the procurement requirements for the purchase of wrestling mats for Daugavpils Olympic Centre, detailing exclusion and selection criteria, technical and financial offer specifications, and evaluation criteria based on the lowest price.

Nolikums DOC 2026/2DOC
NOLIKUMS_DOC_2026_2.doc -- 397.0 KB

This document contains the tender regulations for the procurement of wrestling mats by SIA “Daugavpils Olimpiskais centrs”, detailing general information, subject description, submission procedures, and bidder requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally clear and well-structured, but significant concerns exist regarding restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value, which diminish transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure type is clearly defined. However, the undisclosed estimated value and, more critically, the 'Restricted document access' are significant compliance concerns regarding transparency and equal access to information.

•Restricted document access
•Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity85/100

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-structured and understandable, covering exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated.

Completeness65/100

While basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided, the estimated value is not disclosed. The 'Restricted document access' is a major completeness issue, as bidders cannot fully assess the opportunity or prepare a bid without full access to documents.

•Estimated value not disclosed
•Restricted document access
Fairness50/100

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw impacting fairness, as it prevents equal access to essential information for all potential bidders. The undisclosed estimated value also reduces overall transparency.

•Restricted document access
•Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and duration is specified. However, the undisclosed estimated value, lack of a contract start date, and 'Restricted document access' reduce the practicality for bidders to prepare comprehensive offers.

•Restricted document access
•Estimated value not disclosed
Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency is the undisclosed estimated value. Contradictions regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission were reconciled based on explicit tender data.

•Estimated value not disclosed
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is common for straightforward procurements but results in a low score for this specific criterion.

•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria

Strengths

Clear tender title and description
Open procedure with reasonable submission deadline
E-Procurement enabled
Evaluation criteria (lowest price) clearly stated
Documents are listed and summarized

Concerns

Restricted document access
Estimated value not disclosed
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Contract start date not specified

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and aid bidder preparation.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where applicable in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes