Energy efficiency improvement in the multi-apartment residential building at Dārza iela 12, Seda, Valmiera municipality

This tender suffers from critical incompleteness due to missing documents and highly inconsistent financial data, severely hindering fair competition and bidder participation, despite some clear technical requirements. The discrepancies raise significant concerns about the transparency and fairness of the procurement process.

The tender appears to follow an open procedure, which is generally positive. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the provided summary is a concern. A comprehensive legal compliance assessment is impossible without access to the full tender documents.

While some technical requirements are clearly stated (e.g., experience, on-site inspection), the overall clarity is severely compromised by the complete absence of all tender documents, proposal templates, and the technical project. The CPV code '7' is too broad and lacks specificity.

The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of all tender documents, including the technical project, detailed specifications, and proposal templates, makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a compliant offer. Key information such as detailed evaluation criteria and full mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds are also not provided.

The fairness of this tender is severely undermined by the lack of accessible documents, creating an uneven playing field. The highly inconsistent estimated value of 0.01 EUR for a substantial energy efficiency project, contrasted with a 400,000 EUR turnover requirement and 5,000 EUR tender security, is highly problematic. This discrepancy, combined with restricted document access, strongly suggests that the tender may be tailored for a specific company or is so fundamentally flawed that it effectively limits competition to those with insider information.

It is impractical, if not impossible, for bidders to prepare and submit a compliant and competitive bid without access to any tender documents, technical specifications, or proposal templates. The requirement for an on-site inspection is good practice but becomes meaningless without the full tender context.

There are major inconsistencies in the provided data. The estimated value of 0.01 EUR for an energy efficiency project is fundamentally inconsistent with the nature of the works and the financial requirements (EUR 400,000 turnover, EUR 5,000 tender security). The CPV code '7' is also too broad and lacks precision.

No explicit green procurement or social criteria are mentioned in the provided summary. For an EU-funded energy efficiency project, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives.