Development of complete, multi-branch design and cost documentation, including author's supervision for real estate investments in Kołobrzeg.

This tender for design documentation and author's supervision in Kołobrzeg is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and available documentation. However, it lacks specific financial details and evaluation criteria, and the submission process is not fully detailed.

The tender adheres to general legal requirements by providing a CPV code and referencing relevant legislation. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is not fully assessable without more context. The procedure is not explicitly defined beyond 'None', which is unusual but not necessarily non-compliant if internal procedures are followed. No disputes are indicated.

The title and description clearly outline the scope of work: design documentation and author's supervision for real estate investments. Technical capabilities are specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a detailed submission process reduces overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. The estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing. Key documents (SWZ, PPU) are referenced and available, which is a strong point. However, the lack of financial details and contract duration impacts completeness.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', indicating a fair process. Documents are accessible. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The value is not disclosed, which is a minor concern for fairness, but objective criteria are expected to be in the SWZ.

The tender specifies 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. A contract start date is not provided. Financing information is absent. The duration of the contract is not specified, which hinders practical planning for potential bidders.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The status is 'active'. No suspension or disputes are noted. Dates are logical. The CPV code is appropriate for the service described.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.