Tenders

Appointment of Integrated Supply Team for Proposed Priory Integrated College

Open
Deadline
287 days left
December 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
005116-2026
Value
£44,400,000
Location
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 21, 2026

Deadline for Questions

December 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

December 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 16, 2026

Budget
£44,400,000
Duration
21 months
Location
Northern Ireland
Type
Other
54
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

The project is for the provision of the new Priory Integrated College to be located on a brown field site located in Holywood, Co Down. The outcome of this proposed project will be to deliver a state-of-the-art post primary education facility for the school's long-term enrolment of 600 pupils.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit a Request to Participate by the deadline of 6 February 2026.
--Be prepared to submit a full tender proposal by 16 December 2026, if invited to the second stage of the restricted procedure.
--The submission must be for the appointment of an Integrated Supply Team for the new Priory Integrated College project.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in the provided snippets.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Be a legal entity capable of undertaking building construction work (CPV 45210000).
--Be capable of acting as an Integrated Supply Team for a large-scale construction project.
--Be able to deliver a state-of-the-art post-primary education facility.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Demonstrate proven experience in constructing post-primary education facilities.
--Demonstrate proven experience in delivering state-of-the-art educational facilities.
--Demonstrate proven experience in brownfield site development and construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Possess the necessary financial capacity to undertake a construction project with an estimated value of approximately 44,400,000 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
005116-2026_ocds_record.json

This document is an OCDS Record providing structured data about the tender for the new Priory Integrated College project.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
005116-2026_ocds_release.json

File not found or empty

Official PDF VersionPDF
005116-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the appointment of an Integrated Supply Team to construct the new Priory Integrated College in Holywood, Co Down, a £37M project for a 600-pupil post-primary education facility, with a deadline for requests to participate by 6 February 2026.

Tender NoticeHTM
005116-2026.html

This document is a contract award notice from NHS Lincolnshire ICB, detailing the direct award of a £90,589 contract for Primary Care Enhanced Services, including phlebotomy, treatment room, and minor injuries.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

54
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender documentation is significantly flawed, primarily due to the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which severely undermines transparency and fairness. Additionally, there are issues with document availability and data consistency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the overall timeline for a restricted procedure appears reasonable. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and, more critically, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria represent significant legal compliance deficiencies, potentially violating principles of transparency and equal treatment in public procurement.

No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity55/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and specific regarding the scope of work. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, which is a critical flaw in clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location is provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria, empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, and significant issues with the provided documents (irrelevant content in Document 1, missing content in Document 3).

No evaluation criteria specified
Irrelevant content in Document 1 summary (NHS Lincolnshire ICB)
Fairness45/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements, while specific, do not appear overtly tailored to a single company. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection. The absence of e-submission and issues with document access further detract from equal opportunity.

No evaluation criteria specified
No e-submission
Practicality55/100

Key dates like contract start and duration are specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. Furthermore, the issues with document availability and relevance (Document 1, Document 3) create practical hurdles for interested parties.

No e-submission
Issues with document availability/relevance
Data Consistency65/100

The tender generally presents consistent data, with no reported disputes or suspensions. However, there is a notable discrepancy between the estimated value stated in the basic information (€44.4M) and the value mentioned in Document 2 (£37M). Several fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are also left empty.

Value discrepancy (£37M vs 44.4M EUR)
Empty fields (Liable Person, Type Code, Procedure Code)
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Estimated value and duration are specified
CPV code is correctly assigned
No reported disputes or suspensions
Overall timeline for restricted procedure is reasonable

Concerns

Complete absence of evaluation criteria
Issues with tender document content (irrelevant/missing files)
Discrepancy in estimated project value (£ vs EUR)
Lack of electronic submission support
No explicit mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish clear and comprehensive evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
2. Rectify document issues by providing correct and complete tender documents, including a functional OCDS Release Package.
3. Clarify the discrepancy in the estimated project value to avoid confusion for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline