Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login12 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines requirements for joint bidder power of attorney, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, business secret handling, and confirmation of equivalency, which are necessary for submitting a bid for the Narva City Roads and Streets Resurfacing 2026 tender.
Bidders must submit a detailed cost breakdown for road resurfacing works, including all costs reasonably necessary to achieve the contract's objective.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria and weighting for bid cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.
The contracting authority, Narva City Government's Urban Management Department, is seeking bids for the resurfacing of roads and streets in Narva in 2026, with the technical specification detailing site inspection information.
This document presents the draft contractor agreement for the Narva city roads and streets resurfacing 2026 tender, outlining the contracting parties and their representatives.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for road resurfacing in Narva is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of certain technical documents.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The use of a reverse procedure for qualification checks is a common practice and generally acceptable.
The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications, while not fully accessible for AI analysis, are referenced. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, implying a clear method. The requirements are documented, though some document summaries could be more detailed.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI could not analyze all attached documents (e.g., JPG, XML), potentially missing crucial details. The requirement for a cost breakdown is clear, but the full scope of attached documents is not entirely verifiable.
The tender is conducted electronically, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are objective (lowest price). The reverse procedure for qualification checks is a standard practice that does not inherently disadvantage bidders. Access to documents is generally good, though some formats are problematic.
E-submission and e-procurement are specified. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. While a draft contract is provided, the lack of explicit financing details and contract start date slightly reduces practicality.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated correctly. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The data presented is consistent and reliable.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is a significant omission.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required