Technical maintenance and repair of heating boiler house equipment and devices, purchase of equipment spare parts for emergency repairs

This tender for boiler house maintenance services demonstrates good foundational elements in terms of clarity and basic information, but is significantly hampered by critical transparency issues, including restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code clearly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned. However, restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value are significant transparency issues that impact full legal compliance with public procurement principles.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized. Document summaries indicate that detailed requirements, including evaluation criteria, are specified within the tender documents. The primary challenge to clarity for potential bidders is the restricted access to these detailed documents.

Most essential information, such as title, organization, reference, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, which is a notable gap in completeness.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value, which limit transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders. Additionally, there is a contradiction regarding e-submission support, which could create an uneven playing field.

The tender specifies the contract duration. However, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag creates practical uncertainty for bidders. The absence of a contract start date and detailed financing information (estimated value) also reduces practicality.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' flag. While the document summary clarifies evaluation criteria, the e-procurement contradiction remains a data integrity concern.

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.