Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and reconstruction works with factory-prefabricated elements for apartment building at Kalda tee 20, Tartu (EIS)

Open
Deadline
30 days left
May 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
308188
Value
€3,225,806
Location
Estonia
Published
March 30, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Final bid price for the factory reconstruction of the apartment building at Kalda tee 20, Tartu100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 30, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 04, 2026

Tender Opening

May 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€3,225,806
Duration
20 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Design-build procurement for factory reconstruction of Kalda tee 20, Tartu. Procurement is organized by EIS. Site visit is possible by appointment: Silver Kuusik, tel 524 8456, e-mail: kuusikhaldus@gmail.com No questions will be answered during the site visit; contractors are requested to submit questions through the public procurement register. See attached documents for procurement for more details.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the design and reconstruction of an apartment building at Kalda tee 20, Tartu, prioritizes cost-effectiveness. A winning strategy will focus on a highly competitive price, demonstrating technical competence in pre-fabricated element reconstruction, and leveraging the 'Green Procurement' aspect to add value beyond the lowest price.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective, High-Quality Reconstruction with Sustainable Design

Proven Expertise in Pre-fabricated Element Solutions for Energy Efficient Buildings

Key Opportunities
Leveraging 'Green Procurement' to differentiate beyond price.
Capitalizing on the focus on pre-fabricated elements for efficiency and quality.
The absence of explicit technical evaluation criteria suggests a strong emphasis on price, allowing a well-priced bid to be highly competitive.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to cost-based evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize supply chain, and identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore economies of scale if applicable.

Potential for ambiguity in technical requirements if not fully detailed in 'Lähteülesanne'.

Thoroughly review 'Lähteülesanne' and all attached documents. Submit clarifying questions through the official procurement register well in advance of the deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in designing and executing facade reconstruction projects, particularly those involving pre-fabricated elements. The ideal bidder will have a strong track record of cost control, efficient project management, and a commitment to energy efficiency improvements, aligning with the 'Green Procurement' requirement.
Key Requirements
Submission of bid in the provided form (Pakkumusvorm Kalda tee 20.xlsx) including all design and reconstruction costs.
Confirmation of no mandatory exclusion grounds.
Confirmation of meeting qualification requirements and possessing necessary construction registrations.
Compliance with terms in base documents, including the 'Lähteülesanne' (Terms of Reference) and 'Lepingu projekt' (Contract Draft).
Demonstration of technical capability for design and reconstruction works, especially with pre-fabricated elements.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience and case studies of successful pre-fabricated element facade reconstruction projects with measurable energy efficiency improvements.
A clear and compelling approach to integrating sustainable materials and practices within the 'Green Procurement' framework, going beyond minimum requirements.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that instills confidence in the bidder's pricing strategy.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local labor during the reconstruction phase, with a focus on upskilling opportunities for less experienced workers.
Prioritizing the use of locally sourced and sustainable building materials where feasible, contributing to the local economy and reducing environmental impact.
Bid Focus Areas
CostMaximum points for lowest price

Develop a highly competitive and lean pricing strategy. Ensure all costs are meticulously accounted for in 'Pakkumusvorm Kalda tee 20.xlsx'. Explore all avenues for cost reduction through efficient design and construction methods.

Technical Capability (implied)

While not explicitly weighted, the technical solution must be robust and clearly align with the 'Lähteülesanne'. Highlight expertise in pre-fabricated elements and energy efficiency in the narrative sections of the bid, if permitted.

Green Procurement

Detail specific measures for energy efficiency improvements, material selection, and waste reduction that exceed baseline expectations. Frame these as value-adds that contribute to long-term sustainability and resident comfort.

Recommendations7
Meticulous Bid Form Completion
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure 'Pakkumusvorm Kalda tee 20.xlsx' is completed accurately and comprehensively, including all design and reconstruction costs. Any omissions or errors could lead to disqualification.

Ensures bid is compliant and competitive.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the primary evaluation criterion is cost, develop a highly competitive price. This requires detailed cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract.

Maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Highlight Pre-fabricated Element Expertise
HighMed effort

Emphasize the company's proven experience and efficiency in designing and implementing reconstruction projects using pre-fabricated elements. Showcase past projects with similar scope and complexity.

Builds confidence in technical capability and project execution.
Thorough Document Review and Clarification
HighMed effort

Conduct an in-depth review of all tender documents ('Lähteülesanne', 'Lepingu projekt', etc.). Submit any necessary clarifying questions through the official procurement register well before the deadline to avoid assumptions.

Minimizes risk of non-compliance and ensures a clear understanding of scope.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
MediumLow effort

Include a commitment to utilizing local labor for the construction phase, potentially detailing training or upskilling initiatives. This aligns with broader public sector social value objectives.

Adds value beyond price and enhances social responsibility image.
Confirm Eligibility and Exclusion Grounds
HighMed effort

Thoroughly verify all eligibility requirements and ensure no mandatory exclusion grounds apply. Prepare all necessary documentation to demonstrate compliance proactively.

Prevents disqualification on technical grounds.
Integrate Green Procurement Value
HighMed effort

Beyond meeting minimum requirements, detail specific innovative or advanced green procurement measures in the bid narrative (if space allows) or supporting documents. Focus on energy savings, material sustainability, and waste reduction.

Demonstrates a forward-thinking approach and adds value beyond basic compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the quality and sustainability promised by the 'Green Procurement' aspect. Highlight the efficiency gains from using pre-fabricated elements as a key driver of cost savings and timely completion.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must confirm compliance with the conditions set in the base documents of the procurement procedure.
--Bidders must submit their bid in the form provided by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must consider requirements for joint bids and representation rights.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm they are not subject to exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm they meet qualification requirements.
--Bidders must possess necessary registrations for construction activities.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in provided summaries, but implied by the nature of design and reconstruction works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in provided summaries, but implied by the need for a price offer.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308188_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.6 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with the terms set out in the procurement documents and submit their bid using the form provided by the contracting authority, considering joint bids and representation rights.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308188_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.4 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, where the lowest price receives maximum points, and the submitted total cost of works must include all design and reconstruction expenses.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
308188_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 24.3 KB

Bidders must confirm they do not meet exclusion grounds and meet qualification criteria, including necessary registrations for construction activities.

LähteülesanneDOC
Kalda tee 20 projekteerimise-ehitustöövõtu lä... -- 5.4 MB

This terms of reference outlines the design and construction works for the reconstruction of the apartment building at Kalda tee 20, based on this document and applicable energy efficiency support conditions.

Lepingu projektDOC
Lepingu_projekt.docx -- 79.8 KB

The contract draft includes general terms and conditions of the procurement contract, definitions, and special conditions necessary for preparing the bid and fulfilling the contract.

PakkumuskutsePDF
Pakkumuskutse, projekt+rek 2026.pdf -- 451.7 KB

This invitation to tender calls for bids for the design and reconstruction works of the apartment building at Kalda tee 20, Tartu, clarifying the procurement procedure's terms and requirements.

PakkumusvormXLS
Pakkumusvorm Kalda tee 20.xlsx -- 28.2 KB

The bid form is a mandatory document where the bidder submits their price offer for the cost of works according to the table provided by the contracting authority.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for reconstruction works in Tartu is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a focus on electronic submission. However, it lacks explicit detail on technical and financial capabilities, and sustainability aspects are only partially addressed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and requirements are documented through various attached files. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' with a primary focus on cost, which is sufficiently specified. Conditions for participation are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and financing conditions. However, specific details on technical and financial capability requirements are not explicitly detailed in the summary, relying on bidders to refer to attached documents.

Lack of explicit detail on technical and financial capability requirements in the summary.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access via e-procurement and disclosure of the estimated value. Objective criteria (lowest price) are stated. Deadlines are reasonable. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the contract duration is provided. Financing information is detailed. The reliance on bidders to refer to numerous attached documents for full understanding might slightly reduce practicality.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating some consideration for environmental aspects. However, specific social criteria or innovation focus are not detailed in the provided summary.

Lack of explicit detail on social criteria and innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear description of works and objectives.
Emphasis on e-procurement and electronic submission.
Disclosure of estimated value and financing conditions.
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration specified.

Concerns

Technical and financial capability requirements are not explicitly detailed in the summary.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Limited explicit detail on social and innovation aspects of sustainability.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly detail technical and financial capability requirements in the summary for improved clarity.
2. Specify the contract start date for better planning.
3. Provide more concrete examples or targets for green procurement, social aspects, and innovation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline