Skip to main content
Tenders

Oral care products/oral hygiene supplies

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
308035
Value
€65,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€65,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for the purchase of oral care products/oral hygiene supplies. Product descriptions are provided in Annex 1. The procurement is divided into 13 lots. Bids can be submitted for one or more lots. The names, descriptions, and estimated quantities of oral care products/oral hygiene supplies included in the shopping cart are presented in Annex 1. The contracting authority has the right to purchase oral care products/oral hygiene supplies outside the shopping cart based on the retail price according to the supplier's valid price list, to which the offered discount percentage applies. The discount percentage is binding for the bidder and must not decrease for the contracting authority during the validity of the framework agreement.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points for all five lots.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Business secrets must be marked appropriately.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per Estonian Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be registered in an EU or EEA country.
--Bidders must confirm their eligibility and provide company data using Form II.
--Joint bidders must appoint a representative using Form I.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in provided summaries, but implied through the need to supply Suuhooldustooted/suuhügieeni tarvikud.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308035_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 128.2 KB

This document outlines requirements for submitting joint bids, marking trade secrets, and confirming bid compliance with tender conditions for the oral hygiene products procurement.

Pakkuja esitab hankemenetluses osalemise avalduse vastavalt Lisa 3 vormile II.DOC
Lisa_3_vorm_II.docx -- 31.7 KB

The bidder must submit an application to participate in the tender procedure according to the provided Form II, entering their company details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308035_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 17.0 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest priced bid receiving maximum points, applied across all five lots.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308035_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 64.0 KB

The Procurement Pass (Hankepass) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, required for tender participation, and includes explanations of the contracting authority's conditions.

Juhised PakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 202.7 KB

This document "Instructions for the Bidder" outlines the rules for the open procurement procedure, requirements for bidders from EU and EEA countries, and general conditions for submitting a bid for the procurement of oral care products/oral hygiene supplies.

RaamlepingPDF
Lisa 2_Raamleping.pdf -- 194.6 KB

This is a framework agreement for the procurement of oral care products and supplies, defining the rights and obligations of the buyer and seller, and the contract objects, including basket products and non-basket products.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa_3_vorm_I.docx -- 31.6 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization letter, empowering one joint bidder to represent others in the procurement procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for oral hygiene products by Tartu University Hospital is generally well-structured and compliant, with clear documentation for most aspects. However, the primary evaluation criterion is cost, and there's a lack of explicit information regarding contract duration and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including proper CPV coding and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate flags for disputes. The use of standardized forms like ESPD (though not directly analyzed for content) suggests adherence to common legal frameworks.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear. Requirements for participation and bid submission are generally well-documented through various provided forms and instructions. The division into lots is clearly stated. However, the absence of explicit technical capability requirements, while implied, could be more detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, organization, and deadlines. Key documents like the framework agreement template and participation forms are indicated. However, specific details regarding contract duration and explicit technical capabilities are not fully detailed in the provided summaries.

Missing contract duration details.
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access via the e-procurement portal. The estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective, with price being the primary driver, which is typical for this type of procurement. There are no specific requirements tailored to individual companies that would indicate a lack of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates e-submission and e-procurement, which is practical. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is not detailed in the provided summaries. While the duration of the framework agreement is mentioned as 'Tender Valid: 3 months', this likely refers to the bid validity, not the contract duration itself, which is a missing practical detail.

Contract start date not specified.
Financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically ordered. The 'Tender Valid: 3 months' is noted, but its ambiguity (bid validity vs. contract duration) is a minor point.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No mention of green procurement.
No mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear tender objective and CPV coding.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Division of tender into multiple parts.
Disclosure of estimated value.

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond cost.
Lack of information on contract duration.
Absence of sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Provide explicit evaluation criteria for non-cost factors if any.
2. Specify the contract duration clearly.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., green procurement) into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline