Skip to main content
Tenders

Tartu liiklusuuring 2026

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
308031
Value
€35,500
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of work100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 26, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€35,500
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€100,264
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
624 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Hanke eesmrgiks on koguda, ajakohastada ja analüüsida Tartu linna liiklusandmeid ning uuendada linnaliikluse mudelit (sh koostada ülelinnaline ööpäevase keskmise liikluse kaart – AKÖL), et tagada kvaliteetne sisend Tartu linna 2026. aasta strateegilise mürakaardi jaoks.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must confirm that they agree to all the terms of the tender documents and submit their bid according to the specified structure.
--The bid must be submitted electronically.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-07 07:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that they agree to all the terms of the tender documents and submit their bid according to the specified structure.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The Hankepass is the entrepreneur's own confirmation, which is initial proof of compliance with the conditions and qualification requirements set by the contracting authority, but it is not filled out directly, but electronically.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of the work, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
308031_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.9 KB

Bidders must confirm their acceptance of all tender document conditions and submit their bid according to the provided structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
308031_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on the cost of the work, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
308031_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.9 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

Hanke alusdokumentPDF
Liiklusuuring alusdokument.pdf -- 192.9 KB

Tartu City Government invites bids for conducting the Tartu Traffic Study 2026, with the terms of the service contract detailed in the tender documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a traffic study in Tartu is generally well-structured with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific details on technical capabilities and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear, outlining the need for traffic data analysis and model updates for strategic noise mapping. Requirements for bid submission are documented, and evaluation criteria are mentioned.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, specific technical capability requirements are not detailed in the provided text, and the financing condition, while present, could be more explicit regarding the payment schedule beyond '7 working days'.

Technical capability requirements not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective, focusing on cost with the lowest price receiving maximum score. E-procurement is utilized. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is implied through the tender documents. The contract start date is specified. Financing is from the Tartu city budget, with no advance payment. The duration is defined as 'PERIOD'.

Specific document URLs are not directly provided in the extracted text, requiring navigation through the e-procurement platform.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).

Strengths

Clear objective and description of the traffic study.
Well-defined financial information and payment terms.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Absence of specified technical capability requirements.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Limited detail on the structure of the bid beyond general confirmation.

Recommendations

1. Specify minimum technical capabilities or experience required for bidders.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the evaluation or requirements.
3. Provide more detailed guidance on the expected bid structure.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline