Skip to main content
Tenders

Replacement of wind turbine blade bearings bolts in Pakri wind farm

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307851
Value
€180,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
The tenderer enters the value calculated by the automatic formula (cell F11) in the "Tender price" form.100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€180,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Replacement of wind turbine blade bearings bolts in Pakri wind farm. More detailed requirements for the works are in the "Technical description" base document, and the contract terms are in the "Draft contract" base document.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Confirmation of no grounds for exclusion.
--Evidence of technician certifications.
--A work plan.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must confirm that they do not have grounds for exclusion as stipulated in the Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit evidence of technician certifications.
--Bidders must submit a work plan.
--Bidders must confirm fulfillment of all tender conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Evidence of technician certifications.
--A work plan for the bolt replacement works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The cost of the bid.
--A detailed price calculation for the bolt replacement works, including prices for labor, waiting time, and travel costs.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307851_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.2 KB

Bidders must submit proof of technician certifications, a work plan, and tender price, while confirming adherence to all tender conditions.

Tender priceXLS
Tender price.xlsx -- 20.4 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed price calculation for the replacement of wind turbine blade bearings bolts at Pakri wind farm, including costs for labor, waiting time, and travel expenses.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307851_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the bidder with the lowest price receives the maximum number of points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307851_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 3.4 KB

The bidder must confirm that they do not have exclusion grounds as stipulated in the Public Procurement Act to avoid exclusion from the tender procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for wind turbine bolt replacement is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. Key areas for improvement include the explicit inclusion of sustainability criteria and providing access to all necessary tender documents in a readily analyzable format.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including clear classification and reference numbers. Deadlines are provided, and while 'Draft contract' is mentioned, its format limits analysis. The reference to the Public Procurement Act for exclusion grounds indicates regulatory awareness.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are specific. Essential requirements such as technician certifications, work plans, and detailed pricing are clearly outlined, with evaluation criteria based on relative weighting and price. Access to 'Technical description' and 'Draft contract' is crucial for full clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Draft contract' and 'Technical description' are noted as not being available for AI analysis due to format (.zip), which impacts the completeness of the provided tender package. Financing conditions refer to an attached document.

Attached documents ('Draft contract', 'Technical description') in .zip format are not directly analyzable by AI, potentially hindering full comprehension of requirements.
Fairness85/100

The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting and primarily focused on bid price, which is objective. The tender is open to e-submission and e-procurement. No specific tailoring to individual companies is evident. Full document access is assumed if the .zip files were accessible.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are indicated. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated. Financing conditions are referenced to a document, and the .zip format of key documents might present a practical challenge.

The contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. No reported disputes or suspensions. Dates for reveal, submission, and opening are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not flagged as EU funded, and these elements are absent from the provided information.

Lack of explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
Absence of social considerations in the evaluation or requirements.

Strengths

Clear and specific tender title and description.
Well-defined eligibility and technical requirements.
Objective evaluation criterion based on price.
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.

Concerns

Key tender documents (.zip) are not directly analyzable by AI, raising questions about accessibility.
Lack of explicit sustainability or social criteria.
Contract start date not clearly specified.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats (e.g., PDF) for comprehensive evaluation.
2. Integrate sustainability and social considerations into the evaluation criteria.
3. Clearly state the contract start date or the mechanism for its determination.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline