Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of the tribune roof of Heino Lipu Stadium

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307660
Value
€201,613
Location
Estonia
Published
March 17, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€201,613
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of the tribune roof of Heino Lipu Stadium
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score, as per "hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf".
--The contract terms and obligations are detailed in "HD_Lisa_4_HLipu_staadioni_tribuunikatus_ehitus_hankelepingu projekt.docx".
--The base document outlining tender conditions and requirements is "Lisa_HD_HLipu_staadioni_tribuunikatus_ehitus.docx".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders may be excluded if they are involved in fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking (based on subcontractor checks).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must provide a "Hankepass" (tender pass) as initial proof, replacing official certificates.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions outlined in "vastavustingimused.pdf".
--Subcontractors' backgrounds will be checked for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The construction must adhere to the technical specifications detailed in "HD_lisa_2_HLipu staadioni_tribuunikatus_eh_tehniline kirjeldus.docx", including design and construction requirements.
--Requirements include schedule adherence, noise/dust control, obtaining a usage permit, and site supervision.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries, but the tender value is 201613.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307660_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307660_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.4 KB

This document outlines conditions that must be met when submitting a bid, including aspects of joint bids, trade secrets, and subcontractor involvement.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307660_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the primary weight is on the bid price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307660_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 68.9 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD_lisa_2_HLipu staadioni_tribuunikatus_eh_te... -- 54.0 KB

The technical specification document details the requirements for the design and construction of the Heino Lipu stadium grandstand roof, including scheduling, noise/dust control, obtaining a use permit, and site security.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
HD_Lisa_4_HLipu_staadioni_tribuunikatus_ehitu... -- 43.1 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms and conditions of the construction contract for the Heino Lipu stadium grandstand roof, including the obligations of the parties involved.

AlusdokumentDOC
Lisa_HD_HLipu_staadioni_tribuunikatus_ehitus.... -- 54.6 KB

This foundational document outlines the terms and requirements for the public procurement of the Heino Lipu stadium grandstand roof construction.

Volikiri ühispakkuja esindamiseksDOC
Vorm 1 volikiri ühispakkuja esindamiseks.docx -- 14.7 KB

This power of attorney is required when one joint bidder represents another bidder in the tender procedure and contract conclusion.

VolikiriDOC
Vorm 2 volikiri.docx -- 14.5 KB

This power of attorney confirms that the representative is authorized to participate in the public procurement "Heino Lipu Stadium Grandstand Roof Construction" on behalf of the bidder.

Teise isiku nõusolekDOC
Vorm 3 teise isiku nõusolek.docx -- 15.4 KB

This document is a third-party consent form confirming the bidder's technical and professional competence and agreement to participate in contract execution.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of a stadium grandstand roof is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and the process is outlined. No immediate disputes or regulatory non-compliance issues are apparent from the provided data.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached files. Evaluation criteria are mentioned, although the specific weighting is detailed in a separate document. Conditions for participation are generally well-defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financial requirements are not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value, and the contract start date is not specified. Several key documents are referenced but not fully summarized.

Contract start date not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective, and e-procurement is utilized. Deadlines are reasonable. The use of specific forms for powers of attorney and third-party consent is standard practice and does not appear to unfairly target specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is a positive. However, the URL for the opening place is provided, but the specific process for document submission within the e-procurement system could be clearer. The contract start date is missing, impacting practical planning.

Contract start date missing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and title.
Well-defined technical specifications and requirements.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
EU funded project.

Concerns

Missing contract start date.
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Limited detail on financial requirements beyond estimated value.

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract start date for better planning.
2. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement practices.
3. Provide more detailed information on financial requirements or evaluation of financial aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline